 All that part of the understanding of the Sign which the Interpreting Mind has needed collateral observation for is outside the Interpretant. I do not mean by "collateral observation" acquaintance with the system of signs. What is so gathered is not COLLATERAL....  Biosemiotic Research Trends - 41. lappuselaboja - 2007 - 283 lapasIerobežota priekšskatīšana - Par šo grāmatu
 | C. W. Spinks - 1991 - 272 lapas
...Sign which the Interpreting Mind has needed collateral observation for is outside the Interprétant. I do not mean by "collateral observation" acquaintance...prerequisite for getting any idea signified by the sign All that is collateral observation ... is no part of the Interprétant. But to put together the different... | |
 | Kenneth Laine Ketner - 1995 - 476 lapas
...of language, about seventy years after Peirce formulated this view.39 In CP 8.179 Peirce noted that "by collateral observation, I mean previous acquaintance with what the sign denotes." Collateral experience is experience of the object of a sign and can thus be regarded as an indexical... | |
 | G. Debrock - 2003 - 216 lapas
...observation for is outside the lnterpretant. l do not mean by 'collateral observation' acquamtance with the system of signs. What is so gathered is not COLLATERAL. 1t is on the contrary the prerequisite for gettmg any idea signified by the sign. But by collateral... | |
 | Michael H.G. Hoffmann - 2005 - 408 lapas
...Sign which the Interpreting Mind has needed collateral observation for is outside the Interpretant. I do not mean by "collateral observation" acquaintance...previous acquaintance with what the sign denotes. Thus if the Sign be the sentence "Hamlet was mad," to understand what this means one must know that... | |
| |
