Amending Federal Trade Commission Act. Hearings ... on H.R. 38711948 - 298 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 62.
3. lappuse
... effects on competition ( of quantity discounts ) are for the Trade Commission to judge , " and that " Until the Commission has determined the question , courts are not given guidance as to what the public interest does require ...
... effects on competition ( of quantity discounts ) are for the Trade Commission to judge , " and that " Until the Commission has determined the question , courts are not given guidance as to what the public interest does require ...
4. lappuse
... effect as last stated the Supreme Court declared in Federal Trade Commission v . Eastman Kodak Company that " The Commission exercises only the administrative functions delegated to it by the act , not judicial powers " ( 274 U. S. 619 ...
... effect as last stated the Supreme Court declared in Federal Trade Commission v . Eastman Kodak Company that " The Commission exercises only the administrative functions delegated to it by the act , not judicial powers " ( 274 U. S. 619 ...
7. lappuse
... effect two trade - mark laws in this country : One , the trade - mark law that was developed by the courts first of Great Britain and later of this country , and the other law of trade - marks and unfair competition , which has been ...
... effect two trade - mark laws in this country : One , the trade - mark law that was developed by the courts first of Great Britain and later of this country , and the other law of trade - marks and unfair competition , which has been ...
14. lappuse
... effect that you customarily advise your clients when they come in where a prosecution has been brought before the Federal Trade Commission that they cannot win . Why do you make that statement ? Mr. TAGGART . Because the Commission has ...
... effect that you customarily advise your clients when they come in where a prosecution has been brought before the Federal Trade Commission that they cannot win . Why do you make that statement ? Mr. TAGGART . Because the Commission has ...
18. lappuse
... effect the only way in which a respondent can win his case is to be prepared effectively to break every Commission witness on cross - examination . If the case is decided against the respondent and upon any evidence whatever , the right ...
... effect the only way in which a respondent can win his case is to be prepared effectively to break every Commission witness on cross - examination . If the case is decided against the respondent and upon any evidence whatever , the right ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
acts or practices adjudication administrative agencies administrative law Administrative Procedure Act administrative process advertising amended American Bar Association antitrust application attorney BERGE CASSEDY cease and desist CHAIRMAN circuit court Clayton Act Commis Commission's committee complaint Congress counsel court of appeals decide decision district court DOLLIVER ELLSWORTH enactment enforcement experience Federal courts Federal Trade Commission filed findings of fact Food and Drug functions Government HALE hearing HESELTON HOGE Interstate Commerce Commission investigation issues judge judicial power judicial review jurisdiction jury justice legislative litigation matter methods of competition mission O'Hara bill opinion OPPENHEIM order to cease present proceedings prosecuting prosecutor provides public interest quasi-judicial question record respondent Robinson-Patman Act Roscoe Pound separation of powers Sherman Act statement statute stipulation substantial evidence SULLIVAN Supreme Court TAGGART testimony thing tion Trade Commission Act trade practice trade-mark trial examiner unfair methods violation witnesses WOODEN
Populāri fragmenti
279. lappuse - ... if it shall appear to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public, it shall issue and serve upon such person, partnership, or corporation a complaint stating its charges in that respect and containing a notice of a hearing upon a day and at a place therein fixed at least thirty days after the service of said complaint.
291. lappuse - ... unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court.
279. lappuse - If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the opinion that the method of competition or the act or practice in question is prohibited by this Act, it shall make a report in writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts and shall issue and cause to be served on such person, partnership, or corporation an order requiring such person, partnership, or corporation to cease and desist from using such method of competition or such act or practice.
24. lappuse - States a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation, which shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil action brought by the United States.
256. lappuse - After the expiration of the time allowed for filing a petition for review, if no such petition has been duly filed within such time...
194. lappuse - The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their...
244. lappuse - ... be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions for an agency. No officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions for any agency...
123. lappuse - ... no sanction shall be imposed or rule or order be issued except upon consideration of the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party and as supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
197. lappuse - Except as provided in this section, no court Federal, State, or Territorial shall have jurisdiction or power to consider the validity of any such regulation or order, or to stay, restrain, enjoin, or set aside, in whole or in part, any provision of this Act authorizing the issuance of such regulations or orders, or any provision of any such regulation or order, or to restrain or enjoin the enforcement of any such provision.
226. lappuse - unfair method of competition' are not defined by the statute and their exact meaning is in dispute. It is for the courts, not the commission, ultimately to determine as matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud or oppression, or as against public policy because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly.