Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
action administrative agencies Administrative Procedure Act advertising agency amended application Association attorney authority believe BERGE bill Board body cease and desist CHAIRMAN charges circuit court Commerce Commission's committee complaint concerned conclusion Congress counsel course court of appeals deal decide decision determine district court Drug effect enactment enforcement evidence experience fact fair Federal Trade Commission filed final findings follows Food functions Government HALE hearing interest involved issues judge judicial jury justice legislative matter mean mission O'HARA O'Hara bill Office opinion parties person practice present problem proceedings proposed prosecuting provides question reason record referred regulation respect respondent rules separation specialized statement statute substantial Supreme Court testimony thing tion Trade Commission Act trial trial examiner unfair United violation witnesses WOODEN
279. lappuse - ... if it shall appear to the Commission that a proceeding by it in respect thereof would be to the interest of the public, it shall issue and serve upon such person, partnership, or corporation a complaint stating its charges in that respect and containing a notice of a hearing upon a day and at a place therein fixed at least thirty days after the service of said complaint.
291. lappuse - ... unsupported by substantial evidence in a case subject to sections 556 and 557 of this title or otherwise reviewed on the record of an agency hearing provided by statute; or (F) unwarranted by the facts to the extent that the facts are subject to trial de novo by the reviewing court.
279. lappuse - If upon such hearing the Commission shall be of the opinion that the method of competition or the act or practice in question is prohibited by this Act, it shall make a report in writing in which it shall state its findings as to the facts and shall issue and cause to be served on such person, partnership, or corporation an order requiring such person, partnership, or corporation to cease and desist from using such method of competition or such act or practice.
26. lappuse - States a civil penalty of not more than $5,000 for each violation, which shall accrue to the United States and may be recovered in a civil action brought by the United States.
256. lappuse - After the expiration of the time allowed for filing a petition for review, if no such petition has been duly filed within such time...
194. lappuse - The judges, both of the supreme and inferior courts, shall hold their offices during good behaviour, and shall, at stated times, receive for their services, a compensation, which shall not be diminished during their continuance in office. Section 2. The judicial power shall extend to all cases in law and equity, arising under this constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their...
244. lappuse - ... be responsible to or subject to the supervision or direction of any officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions for an agency. No officer, employee, or agent engaged in the performance of investigative or prosecuting functions for any agency...
125. lappuse - ... no sanction shall be imposed or rule or order be issued except upon consideration of the whole record or such portions thereof as may be cited by any party and as supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
197. lappuse - Except as provided in this section, no court Federal, State, or Territorial shall have jurisdiction or power to consider the validity of any such regulation or order, or to stay, restrain, enjoin, or set aside, in whole or in part, any provision of this Act authorizing the issuance of such regulations or orders, or any provision of any such regulation or order, or to restrain or enjoin the enforcement of any such provision.
226. lappuse - unfair method of competition' are not defined by the statute and their exact meaning is in dispute. It is for the courts, not the commission, ultimately to determine as matter of law what they include. They are clearly inapplicable to practices never heretofore regarded as opposed to good morals because characterized by deception, bad faith, fraud or oppression, or as against public policy because of their dangerous tendency unduly to hinder competition or create monopoly.