The Federal ReporterWest Publishing Company, 1948 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 82.
115. lappuse
... rejection recited in the Primary Examiner's statement following the appeal to the board dated July 6 , 1945 , reads : " Claims 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 20 and 21 are finally rejected as not patentably distinguishing over ...
... rejection recited in the Primary Examiner's statement following the appeal to the board dated July 6 , 1945 , reads : " Claims 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 8 , 10 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 20 and 21 are finally rejected as not patentably distinguishing over ...
123. lappuse
... rejected the static inverter claims , on this occasion upon the ground that their rejection in 1941 , as above described , was final and had become res judicata in the Patent Office . On Janu- ary 1 , 1945 , the Board of Appeals in mak ...
... rejected the static inverter claims , on this occasion upon the ground that their rejection in 1941 , as above described , was final and had become res judicata in the Patent Office . On Janu- ary 1 , 1945 , the Board of Appeals in mak ...
548. lappuse
... rejected apparatus claims contained no such limitation and were therefore not directed to the same in- ventive subject matter , the rejection of the apparatus claims was proper . 3. Patents 101 If claims are to be considered in same ...
... rejected apparatus claims contained no such limitation and were therefore not directed to the same in- ventive subject matter , the rejection of the apparatus claims was proper . 3. Patents 101 If claims are to be considered in same ...
Saturs
TABLE OF CONTENTS | |
Judges VII | |
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure XLIX | |
Autortiesības | |
2 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
affirmed alleged amended amount appellant appellant's appellee application Asst Board of Appeals brief certiorari charge Circuit Court Circuit Judges Cite as 168 City Civil Procedure claims Code commerce Commissioner Company complaint contract corporation counsel Court of Appeals damages decision decree defendant defendant's denied disclosed dismissed District Court employees evidence executors F.Supp fact Fair Labor Standards Federal Rules Federal Trade Commission filed findings income Insurance interest interference proceeding Internal Revenue involved issue judgment June jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Labor Standards Act lease liability means ment motion negligence operation paid party Patent Office petition petitioner plaintiff prior art proceeding question reason Reconstruction Finance Corporation reduction to practice regulation rejected remanded S.Ct Stat statute suit supra Supreme Court Tax Court taxpayer tion trial court trust U. S. Atty United United States Attorney Washington York City