The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
8. lappuse
... tion as being fundamental to freedom . It is an incredible quirk of history that as we have worked to try to protect rights under the Constitution , the fundamental right of private property is not one of those rights that has been ...
... tion as being fundamental to freedom . It is an incredible quirk of history that as we have worked to try to protect rights under the Constitution , the fundamental right of private property is not one of those rights that has been ...
11. lappuse
... tion , which is a notion of necessity . Justice Holmes , in the decision which first enunciated the regulatory taking doctrine , referred to the fact that the Government literally could not function if it was required to pay ...
... tion , which is a notion of necessity . Justice Holmes , in the decision which first enunciated the regulatory taking doctrine , referred to the fact that the Government literally could not function if it was required to pay ...
12. lappuse
... tion of this kind with an automatic compensation entitlement , but I hope it will not come to that . It is my understanding that the motivations of this legislation lie primarily in particular problems with particular regulatory stat ...
... tion of this kind with an automatic compensation entitlement , but I hope it will not come to that . It is my understanding that the motivations of this legislation lie primarily in particular problems with particular regulatory stat ...
14. lappuse
... tion because the courts have been very narrow in their interpreta- tion of the takings doctrine . They seem to be moving in the right direction , but they are still very narrowly construing it . If your recommendation that this ...
... tion because the courts have been very narrow in their interpreta- tion of the takings doctrine . They seem to be moving in the right direction , but they are still very narrowly construing it . If your recommendation that this ...
15. lappuse
... tion - we are not going to allow compensation , which is the result the courts would reach today under a large range of Federal regu- lation . But this bill makes no such distinction . This bill says if there is a reduction of any value ...
... tion - we are not going to allow compensation , which is the result the courts would reach today under a large range of Federal regu- lation . But this bill makes no such distinction . This bill says if there is a reduction of any value ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS