The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
2. lappuse
... takings law and court jurisdiction to enable the property owner to vindicate his rights ; requires that all Federal agencies examine proposed regulations to assess the takings impact of those regula- tions ; creates a streamlined ...
... takings law and court jurisdiction to enable the property owner to vindicate his rights ; requires that all Federal agencies examine proposed regulations to assess the takings impact of those regula- tions ; creates a streamlined ...
10. lappuse
... Takings Clause over the years . Much of that litigation over the last 70 years or so has involved the question of when regulation , which does not in- volve the actual taking of property , nevertheless goes so far that it requires the ...
... Takings Clause over the years . Much of that litigation over the last 70 years or so has involved the question of when regulation , which does not in- volve the actual taking of property , nevertheless goes so far that it requires the ...
13. lappuse
... takings . They should not be making so many takings , just to make that clear . Certainly , they would have to think twice before they start doing it because they are going to have to pay for them if they do , which is what the Founding ...
... takings . They should not be making so many takings , just to make that clear . Certainly , they would have to think twice before they start doing it because they are going to have to pay for them if they do , which is what the Founding ...
14. lappuse
... takings doctrine . They seem to be moving in the right direction , but they are still very narrowly construing it . If your recommendation that this legislation be vetoed happens to occur and the veto is sustained , that would be a ...
... takings doctrine . They seem to be moving in the right direction , but they are still very narrowly construing it . If your recommendation that this legislation be vetoed happens to occur and the veto is sustained , that would be a ...
17. lappuse
... Takings Clause . But it says , “ Nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation . " Now , today , the proponents of the legislation that we are meeting here to discuss assert that this clause of the fifth ...
... Takings Clause . But it says , “ Nor shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation . " Now , today , the proponents of the legislation that we are meeting here to discuss assert that this clause of the fifth ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS