The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 58.
3. lappuse
... fair market values for my land and have been told that my land was now valueless because it had been declared a wetland , even though we had never been notified by the Corps of Engineers nor anyone else . When I voiced my opinion that I ...
... fair market values for my land and have been told that my land was now valueless because it had been declared a wetland , even though we had never been notified by the Corps of Engineers nor anyone else . When I voiced my opinion that I ...
18. lappuse
... fair market value of the affected portion by 33 percent or more . The courts now look to the effect of the regulation on the parcel as a whole in assessing the owner's economic injury and judging the burden of regulation by looking at ...
... fair market value of the affected portion by 33 percent or more . The courts now look to the effect of the regulation on the parcel as a whole in assessing the owner's economic injury and judging the burden of regulation by looking at ...
41. lappuse
... fair and flexible . We have already implemented a number of significant regulatory reforms to alleviate burdens on property owners , and we are developing additional ways to improve federal pro- grams to provide greater benefits to the ...
... fair and flexible . We have already implemented a number of significant regulatory reforms to alleviate burdens on property owners , and we are developing additional ways to improve federal pro- grams to provide greater benefits to the ...
42. lappuse
... allows the courts to address the many different situations in which regulations might affect property . It allows for the fair and just balancing of the property owner's reasonable expectations and property rights with the 42.
... allows the courts to address the many different situations in which regulations might affect property . It allows for the fair and just balancing of the property owner's reasonable expectations and property rights with the 42.
43. lappuse
... fair and just to compensate a property owner . But in the very case that established the concept of a regulatory taking- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v . Mahon ( 1922 ) -the Supreme Court was careful to empha- size that " [ g ] overnment ...
... fair and just to compensate a property owner . But in the very case that established the concept of a regulatory taking- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v . Mahon ( 1922 ) -the Supreme Court was careful to empha- size that " [ g ] overnment ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS