The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
2. lappuse
... environment as well as public health and safety . Those who call this bill flawed should understand that they are , in essence , calling a part of the Bill of Rights flawed in the same breath . It is our purpose to enact this ...
... environment as well as public health and safety . Those who call this bill flawed should understand that they are , in essence , calling a part of the Bill of Rights flawed in the same breath . It is our purpose to enact this ...
19. lappuse
... environment if we stop emit- ting CFC's . But as I read this bill and listen to my friend from Utah , there would be ... environmental laws that we already have . For- get wetlands for a minute . There are a lot 19.
... environment if we stop emit- ting CFC's . But as I read this bill and listen to my friend from Utah , there would be ... environmental laws that we already have . For- get wetlands for a minute . There are a lot 19.
20. lappuse
... environment and , in turn , to us . They would have to go out there and set aside a fund to com- pensate everybody whose property was impacted upon by a third or more who produced CFC's . If that is true , we are talking about a ...
... environment and , in turn , to us . They would have to go out there and set aside a fund to com- pensate everybody whose property was impacted upon by a third or more who produced CFC's . If that is true , we are talking about a ...
21. lappuse
... environment . That costs money , so that is a taking , right ? Mr. SCHMIDT . Yes ; I mean , the question is whether it is a taking in the constitutional sense , but it could be . Senator BIDEN . That is what this bill is talking about ...
... environment . That costs money , so that is a taking , right ? Mr. SCHMIDT . Yes ; I mean , the question is whether it is a taking in the constitutional sense , but it could be . Senator BIDEN . That is what this bill is talking about ...
23. lappuse
... environment , but in a lot of other environments in the last year . Although I know our Constitution does not differen- tiate property rights from big corporations or little individuals— they are all treated the same - I think there is ...
... environment , but in a lot of other environments in the last year . Although I know our Constitution does not differen- tiate property rights from big corporations or little individuals— they are all treated the same - I think there is ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS