The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 98.
7. lappuse
... decisions . Because if we want to protect the Red Cockaded Woodpecker , or endangered rats in California , part of the cost of that protection will be paying private land owners who have the value of their land in use or exchange ...
... decisions . Because if we want to protect the Red Cockaded Woodpecker , or endangered rats in California , part of the cost of that protection will be paying private land owners who have the value of their land in use or exchange ...
10. lappuse
... decision has ever come anywhere close to upholding or maintaining the doctrine which is embodied in the legislation before this com- mittee . That legislation provides , that , regardless of any of those other factors , the Government ...
... decision has ever come anywhere close to upholding or maintaining the doctrine which is embodied in the legislation before this com- mittee . That legislation provides , that , regardless of any of those other factors , the Government ...
11. lappuse
... decision which first enunciated the regulatory taking doctrine , referred to the fact that the Government literally could not function if it was required to pay compensation every time it took action that re- duced the value of property ...
... decision which first enunciated the regulatory taking doctrine , referred to the fact that the Government literally could not function if it was required to pay compensation every time it took action that re- duced the value of property ...
24. lappuse
... decisions on takings issues , only 2 were decided in favor of property owners . Litigation under the Takings Clause is extremely expen- sive and time - consuming to do , and hence very costly . Aggrieved property owners are effectively ...
... decisions on takings issues , only 2 were decided in favor of property owners . Litigation under the Takings Clause is extremely expen- sive and time - consuming to do , and hence very costly . Aggrieved property owners are effectively ...
25. lappuse
... decisions on the takings issue in 1993 , only 2 were decided in favor of the property owner . Moreover , litigation under the Takings Clause is generally more expensive and time consuming than other types of litigation because of its ...
... decisions on the takings issue in 1993 , only 2 were decided in favor of the property owner . Moreover , litigation under the Takings Clause is generally more expensive and time consuming than other types of litigation because of its ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS