The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
11. lappuse
... action that re- duced the value of property . There really are two alternatives available to us with respect to any significant form of regulation if this bill passes . One is that we will take a look at it and see that the price is so ...
... action that re- duced the value of property . There really are two alternatives available to us with respect to any significant form of regulation if this bill passes . One is that we will take a look at it and see that the price is so ...
13. lappuse
... action involved is one that would violate State law nuisance prin- ciples , it seems to me gets you almost nowhere in dealing with the areas of Federal regulation that we are concerned about . Really , by definition , the Federal ...
... action involved is one that would violate State law nuisance prin- ciples , it seems to me gets you almost nowhere in dealing with the areas of Federal regulation that we are concerned about . Really , by definition , the Federal ...
14. lappuse
... action is sufficiently severe and restric- tive that it shall be deemed to be a taking , we are going to take into account the various factors that the courts have looked to , such as the initial expectation of the property owner , the ...
... action is sufficiently severe and restric- tive that it shall be deemed to be a taking , we are going to take into account the various factors that the courts have looked to , such as the initial expectation of the property owner , the ...
18. lappuse
... action that , one , deprives the owner , even temporarily , of economic , beneficial , or productive use of a property , or that part of a property affected by the action , or diminishes the fair market value of the affected portion by ...
... action that , one , deprives the owner , even temporarily , of economic , beneficial , or productive use of a property , or that part of a property affected by the action , or diminishes the fair market value of the affected portion by ...
19. lappuse
... action , the same burden of proof you would have to use in a tort action . Won't the Government in this circumstance have to prove , if this bill passes , that the Biden Refrigeration Company that is emitting CFC's into the air - that ...
... action , the same burden of proof you would have to use in a tort action . Won't the Government in this circumstance have to prove , if this bill passes , that the Biden Refrigeration Company that is emitting CFC's into the air - that ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS