The Right to Own Property: Hearing Before the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, One Hundred Fourth Congress, First Session, on S. 605, a Bill to Establish a Uniform and More Efficient Federal Process for Protecting Property Owners' Rights Guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment, Washington, DC; Salt Lake City, UT; and Washington, DC, April 6, July 3, and October 18, 1995, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 1996 - 402 lappuses |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 100.
10. lappuse
... Supreme Court decision has ever come anywhere close to upholding or maintaining the doctrine which is embodied in the legislation before this com- mittee . That legislation provides , that , regardless of any of those other factors ...
... Supreme Court decision has ever come anywhere close to upholding or maintaining the doctrine which is embodied in the legislation before this com- mittee . That legislation provides , that , regardless of any of those other factors ...
16. lappuse
... courts have applied , contrary to this bill , for quite a while , particularly since the Penn Central case decided by the Supreme Court , is you look to the aggregate of the property owner's interest , not to a sin- gle portion of it ...
... courts have applied , contrary to this bill , for quite a while , particularly since the Penn Central case decided by the Supreme Court , is you look to the aggregate of the property owner's interest , not to a sin- gle portion of it ...
17. lappuse
... Supreme Court has explained , the Government's right to take private property for public use is the right , obviously , of emi- nent domain , the thing that most people think about , and it , “ ap- pertains to every independent ...
... Supreme Court has explained , the Government's right to take private property for public use is the right , obviously , of emi- nent domain , the thing that most people think about , and it , “ ap- pertains to every independent ...
18. lappuse
... Supreme Court has developed a body of law around the question of constitutional takings . Very oversimplified , the Court has held that no taking occurs where a regulation promotes health , safety , morals , and government welfare . Or ...
... Supreme Court has developed a body of law around the question of constitutional takings . Very oversimplified , the Court has held that no taking occurs where a regulation promotes health , safety , morals , and government welfare . Or ...
23. lappuse
... Supreme Court case left that issue up in the air and left it open , and the Federal circuit court in the Flor- ida Rock case created a balancing test to determine what is , “ par- tial taking . " All we are trying to do is tell the Supreme ...
... Supreme Court case left that issue up in the air and left it open , and the Federal circuit court in the Flor- ida Rock case created a balancing test to determine what is , “ par- tial taking . " All we are trying to do is tell the Supreme ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
33 percent acres ADLER Administration agency action American apply CHAIRMAN City Clean Water Act Committee common law Congress Constitution contract costs County Court of Federal create decision economic Endangered Species Act environment erty example farm farmers Federal Claims Federal Government Fifth Amendment going government action government regulation habitat harm homeowners impact individual interest issue jurisdiction Justice landowners legislation litigation Lucas LUDWISZEWSKI MARZULLA ment million nuisance exception nuisance law Omnibus Property Rights pensation permit pollution private property owners private property rights problems prop property owners Property Rights Act property values proposed public rights question recognized regulatory takings require compensation restrictions result safety SCHMIDT Section 404 Senator BIDEN Senator DEWINE Senator THURMOND standard statute Supreme Court Takings Clause Thank tion Title U.S. SENATOR U.S. Supreme Court Utah Utah County Utah Lake water rights wetlands WILKINS