Digital Television: A Private Sector Perspective on the Transition : Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, First Session, March 15, 2001, 4. sējumsU.S. Government Printing Office, 2001 - 113 lappuses |
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
agreement American analog spectrum analog television ARLAND bandwidth broadcast signals broadcast television cable carriage cable companies cable industry cable operators cable systems Chairman committee Communications competitive Congress consumer electronics copy protection cost COURTNEY customers digital broadcast digital cable digital must carry digital programming digital services digital signal digital spectrum digital technology digital television digital transition digital TV DTV products DTV receivers DTV transition educational Formats Fox Television Stations FRANKS going HDTV HDTV programming hearing Hearst-Argyle Television high-definition Internet issues ital mandate manufacturers marketplace megahertz million multicast NTSC over-the-air broadcasts Paxson percent primary video public broadcasters public television stations RadioShack require retail retransmission satellite set top box SHIMKUS standard STEARNS subcommittee sumers tele television sets Television Stations Inc Thank Thomson tion transition to digital Tribune Broadcasting TV sets UPTON viewers Warner WETA WILLNER
Populāri fragmenti
43. lappuse - In conclusion, thank you again for the opportunity to testify and I look forward to your questions. [The prepared statement of Mr.
54. lappuse - ... burden substantially more speech than is necessary to further the government's legitimate interests." [ ] Congress declared that the must-carry provisions serve three interrelated interests: (1) preserving the benefits of free, over-the-air local broadcast television, (2) promoting the widespread dissemination of information from a multiplicity of sources, and (3) promoting fair competition in the market for television programming.
11. lappuse - We recognize the distinguished ranking member of the full committee, Mr. Dingell for an opening statement. Mr. DINGELL. Mr. Chairman, I thank you.
47. lappuse - DTV stations were mandated to be broadcasting a digital has asked for comments on transition issues, including under what circumstances and statutory interpretations will the statutory criteria for the auction of recaptured broadcast television spectrum be satisfied. In the Matter of Carriage of Digital Television Broadcast Signals, CS Docket No.
56. lappuse - HBO is offering more HDTV programming in any given week than all of the broadcast networks combined. Showtime, Madison Square Garden, A&E, and Discovery are also producing high definition programming.
14. lappuse - Mr. UPTON. Ms. Eshoo? Ms. ESHOO. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, for holding the hearing.
31. lappuse - Is often missed In this debate: the government has given broadcasters both the analog and new digital spectrum to transmit both of these signals during the transition period before digital broadcast signals are mandated in 2006. But the law has not granted smaller market cable systems additional bandwidth to carry any of the additional broadcast signals. We have to pay for our additional bandwidth through costly system upgrades. We can only pay for these upgrades by carrying services our customers...
31. lappuse - Mandating digital broadcast on smaller market cable systems would force other existing important services off our systems in order to accommodate digital broadcast signals, which few of our customers could watch now anyway. An important point is often missed in this debate: the government has given broadcasters both the analog and new digital spectrum to transmit both of these signals during the transition period.
95. lappuse - Mr. UPTON. Thank you. Mr. Shimkus. Mr. SHIMKUS. Thank you, Mr. Chairman, and thanks to the panel for their patience.
54. lappuse - First Amendment interests substantially more than is necessary to further the government's substantial interests...