The Practice in Civil Actions and Proceedings at Law in the State of New York: In the Supreme Court, and Other Courts of the State; and Also in the Courts of the United States, 144. lapa,1. sējums
G. & C. & H. Carvill, 1830
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
The Practice in Civil Actions and Proceedings at Law in the State of New ...
Priekšskatījums nav pieejams - 2015
according action affidavit allowed amend amount appear appellate application appointed arrested attachment attend attorney authorised authority bail bill bond brought Caines cause circuit court clerk commenced common pleas costs Cowen Cranch damages debt decision default defendant directed discharge district court duty entered entitled evidence exceptions execution executor facias fact filed final give given grant held hold issue Johns joined judge judgment jurisdiction jury justice lands manner matter ment motion necessary notice obtained original otherwise party person plaintiff plea plead possession Pract practice proceed proceedings record recover relation removed rendered respective rule Saund scire served sheriff statute sufficient suit supreme court taken term thereof Tidd tion trespass trial United unless verdict witness writ writ of error York
283. lappuse - That all the before-mentioned courts of the United States, shall have power to issue writs of scire facias, habeas corpus, and all other writs not specially provided for by statute, which may be necessary for the exercise of their respective jurisdictions, and agreeable to the principles and usages of law.
334. lappuse - State in which a decision in the suit could be had, where is drawn in question the validity of a treaty, or statute of, or an authority exercised under, the United States, and the decision is against their validity ; or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under, any State, on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties or laws of the United States...
256. lappuse - The circuit courts of the United States shall have original cognizance, concurrent with the courts of the several States, of all suits of a civil nature at common law or in equity, where the matter in dispute exceeds, exclusive of costs, the sum or value of five hundred dollars, and arising under the Constitution or laws of the United States...
11. lappuse - And the said records and judicial proceedings authenticated as aforesaid, shall have such faith and credit given to them in every court within the United States, as they have by law or usage in the courts of the state from whence the said records are or shall be taken.
243. lappuse - And shall also have exclusive original cognizance of all civil causes of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction, including all seizures under laws of impost, navigation or trade of the United States, where the seizures are made, on waters which are navigable from the Sea by Vessels of ten or more tons burthen, within their respective districts as well as upon the high seas.
176. lappuse - I do solemnly swear, (or affirm, as the case may be,) that I will support the constitution of the United States, .and the constitution of the State of New- York; and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of the office of according to the best of my ability.
256. lappuse - ... nor shall any district or circuit court have cognizance of any suit to recover the contents of any promissory note or other chose in action in favor of an assignee, unless a suit might have been prosecuted in such court to recover the said contents if no assignment had been made, except in cases of foreign bills of exchange.
334. lappuse - States, and the decision is against their validity, or where is drawn in question the validity of a statute of, or an authority exercised under any State on the ground of their being repugnant to the Constitution, treaties, or laws of the United States, and the decision is in favor of their validity...
341. lappuse - It is the essential criterion of appellate jurisdiction, that it revises and corrects the proceedings in a cause already instituted, and does not create that case.