No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 21.
129. lappuse
... and in support of said motion shows : As to Counts 1 and 2 While the specification and drawings of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose and show clamp members extending through support bars of the character specified ...
... and in support of said motion shows : As to Counts 1 and 2 While the specification and drawings of the Junior Party's application respectively disclose and show clamp members extending through support bars of the character specified ...
130. lappuse
Unlike the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p . 5 , 14th line from bottom ; p . 6 , line 16 ) , the specification of the Junior Party is silent on ...
Unlike the specification of the Senior Party which expressly describes such operation and function ( p . 2 , 7th line from bottom ; p . 5 , 14th line from bottom ; p . 6 , line 16 ) , the specification of the Junior Party is silent on ...
143. lappuse
clearly , in his specification and structure , the means for accomplishing the object called for in the claims . " Steenstrup v . Morton ( App . D.C. ) , 30 F. 2d 867 , 868 ; Lindley v . Shepherd ( App . D.C. ) , 24 F. 2d 606 , 608 .
clearly , in his specification and structure , the means for accomplishing the object called for in the claims . " Steenstrup v . Morton ( App . D.C. ) , 30 F. 2d 867 , 868 ; Lindley v . Shepherd ( App . D.C. ) , 24 F. 2d 606 , 608 .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ