Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 17.
62. lappuse
... respect to matters which have been once considered by the primary examiner will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference . ' Motions ; Procedure Generally ...
... respect to matters which have been once considered by the primary examiner will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference . ' Motions ; Procedure Generally ...
130. lappuse
... respect to each other and maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other " ) . ( Italics supplied . ) There is thus a substantial difference in the concept of the respective parties . There can , therefore ...
... respect to each other and maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other " ) . ( Italics supplied . ) There is thus a substantial difference in the concept of the respective parties . There can , therefore ...
137. lappuse
... respect to each other " renders the claim misdescriptive . The cross beams , which are described as " parallel spaced overlapping cross beams " , are defined as " mounted for .... engagement within opposite ribs of a passageway in a ...
... respect to each other " renders the claim misdescriptive . The cross beams , which are described as " parallel spaced overlapping cross beams " , are defined as " mounted for .... engagement within opposite ribs of a passageway in a ...
Saturs
PAGE | ix |
Eastern Air Lines 311 F 2d 156 136 USPQ | xx |
B v C Interference 855 O G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Autortiesības | |
26 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 56 JPOS 72 USPQ 99 USPQ action adversary adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment assignee award of priority Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commissioner's Company copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision disclosure Double Patenting Edison S.P.A. estoppel evidence F.Supp failure ference final hearing infra inter interference examiner interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule MPEP Natta notice old Rule Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reduction to practice reissue requisites res judicata Rule 94 S.Ct SDNY senior party Sockman Sperry Rand subject matter supra Switzer terminal disclaimer tion USPQ 149 Bd ССРА