No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 19.
130. lappuse
The only reference in the application of Junior Party to telescoping of the panels is in relation to the setting up of the mine stopping ( spec . p . 6 , 6th line from bottom ) . Any telescoping of the panels as a result of distortion ...
The only reference in the application of Junior Party to telescoping of the panels is in relation to the setting up of the mine stopping ( spec . p . 6 , 6th line from bottom ) . Any telescoping of the panels as a result of distortion ...
133. lappuse
Proposed Count E generally follows proposed Count C but is more limited in defining the support bars as generally horizontal and arranged in spaced relation with one another and defines the adjustable means in somewhat different ...
Proposed Count E generally follows proposed Count C but is more limited in defining the support bars as generally horizontal and arranged in spaced relation with one another and defines the adjustable means in somewhat different ...
138. lappuse
necessarily maintained in parallel relation with respect to each other . " The obvious purpose of the cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation .
necessarily maintained in parallel relation with respect to each other . " The obvious purpose of the cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ