No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 20.
133. lappuse
are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping feature and being directed to the structure independently of ...
are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping feature and being directed to the structure independently of ...
135. lappuse
Claim 9 , as amended ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically ... and omits the whereby or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the same general definition of clamping means ...
Claim 9 , as amended ) reads : ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically ... and omits the whereby or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however , the same general definition of clamping means ...
137. lappuse
The final phrase and elements of proposed Count D , namely , means sealing the joints between said panels and said stop ( p ) ing to said passageway , defines nothing but a common and well - known expedient long used in mine ...
The final phrase and elements of proposed Count D , namely , means sealing the joints between said panels and said stop ( p ) ing to said passageway , defines nothing but a common and well - known expedient long used in mine ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ