Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 13.
133. lappuse
are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping fea- ture and being directed to the structure independently of ...
are Counts 4 and 5 , to the structure as installed . Proposed Count C is designed to define the invention of Count 4 somewhat more broadly , eliminating the overlapping fea- ture and being directed to the structure independently of ...
135. lappuse
... Proposed Count B ( ... reads : Claim 9 , as amended ) ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically defines the clamping means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however ...
... Proposed Count B ( ... reads : Claim 9 , as amended ) ( Here set forth proposed count ) This claim more specifically defines the clamping means and omits the " whereby " or functional clause of proposed Count A. It includes , however ...
137. lappuse
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
... count . As to Proposed Count E Proposed Count E , which is copied from Claim 9 of the Junior Party's application is objectionable for the same reasons and upon the same grounds as proposed Count D. Additionally , it is misdescriptive ...
Saturs
PAGE | ix |
Eastern Air Lines 311 F 2d 156 136 USPQ | xx |
B v C Interference 855 O G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Autortiesības | |
26 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 56 JPOS 72 USPQ 99 USPQ action adversary adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment assignee award of priority Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commissioner's Company copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision disclosure Double Patenting Edison S.P.A. estoppel evidence F.Supp failure ference final hearing infra inter interference examiner interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule MPEP Natta notice old Rule Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reduction to practice reissue requisites res judicata Rule 94 S.Ct SDNY senior party Sockman Sperry Rand subject matter supra Switzer terminal disclaimer tion USPQ 149 Bd ССРА