No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 8.
130. lappuse
The clamping of panels 12 comprising channels 20 and 21 to the cross beams 14 , 14 , according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ( ........... application , p . 6 , line 9 ) .
The clamping of panels 12 comprising channels 20 and 21 to the cross beams 14 , 14 , according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ( ........... application , p . 6 , line 9 ) .
135. lappuse
There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are to be adjusted or tensioned so as to allow for telescoping of the channels or panels under pressure as by distortion of the mine floor . Indeed , such operation of the structure of ...
There is no intimation or suggestion that the clips are to be adjusted or tensioned so as to allow for telescoping of the channels or panels under pressure as by distortion of the mine floor . Indeed , such operation of the structure of ...
138. lappuse
The obvious purpose of the cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation . The idea of the thing supported maintaining the support is comparable to that of lifting one's self by ...
The obvious purpose of the cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation . The idea of the thing supported maintaining the support is comparable to that of lifting one's self by ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ