No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 9.
41. lappuse
The proposed amended statement and a satisfactory showing under oath of want of negligence in the preparation of the original statement must accompany the motion . ? If the proposed amendment be based on newly discovered evidence ...
The proposed amended statement and a satisfactory showing under oath of want of negligence in the preparation of the original statement must accompany the motion . ? If the proposed amendment be based on newly discovered evidence ...
44. lappuse
The Board will determine , on the basis of the original showing and the response made , whether the interference should be allowed to proceed or summary judgment should be entered against the junior applicant .
The Board will determine , on the basis of the original showing and the response made , whether the interference should be allowed to proceed or summary judgment should be entered against the junior applicant .
118. lappuse
The word " original was deleted by amendment effective August 15 , 1955. 696 O.G. 420 . Rule 259 provides an approach through the Board ( supra , p . 94 ) . 2 See 2 Rivise & Caesar , pp . 1346-1395 ; Seidman & Horwitz , op . cit .
The word " original was deleted by amendment effective August 15 , 1955. 696 O.G. 420 . Rule 259 provides an approach through the Board ( supra , p . 94 ) . 2 See 2 Rivise & Caesar , pp . 1346-1395 ; Seidman & Horwitz , op . cit .
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ