Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 37.
45. lappuse
... involved from the application of the party making the same on termination of the inter- ference on the basis thereof . " Rule 263 notes a distinction between the disclaimer of Rule 262 and that of 35 USC 253 ( see Rule 321 ) , and re ...
... involved from the application of the party making the same on termination of the inter- ference on the basis thereof . " Rule 263 notes a distinction between the disclaimer of Rule 262 and that of 35 USC 253 ( see Rule 321 ) , and re ...
55. lappuse
... involved patent or of one or more of the involved applications as provided in rules 203 ( a ) and 205 ( a ) . " While specific grounds are not stated as in canceled Rule 232 ( a ) or its antecedent Rule 122 , -thus simplifying the ...
... involved patent or of one or more of the involved applications as provided in rules 203 ( a ) and 205 ( a ) . " While specific grounds are not stated as in canceled Rule 232 ( a ) or its antecedent Rule 122 , -thus simplifying the ...
59. lappuse
... involved the requirements of Rule 205 must be met.1 At this point not only should each claim of each appli- cation involved , whether a count or not , be scrutinized as to accuracy and adequacy of statement but careful con- sideration ...
... involved the requirements of Rule 205 must be met.1 At this point not only should each claim of each appli- cation involved , whether a count or not , be scrutinized as to accuracy and adequacy of statement but careful con- sideration ...
Saturs
PAGE | ix |
Eastern Air Lines 311 F 2d 156 136 USPQ | xx |
B v C Interference 855 O G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Autortiesības | |
26 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 56 JPOS 72 USPQ 99 USPQ action adversary adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment assignee award of priority Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commissioner's Company copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision disclosure Double Patenting Edison S.P.A. estoppel evidence F.Supp failure ference final hearing infra inter interference examiner interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule MPEP Natta notice old Rule Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reduction to practice reissue requisites res judicata Rule 94 S.Ct SDNY senior party Sockman Sperry Rand subject matter supra Switzer terminal disclaimer tion USPQ 149 Bd ССРА