No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 29.
22. lappuse
Interference Issue ; Interpretation of Counts Important at all stages is the interpretation of the interference ... in the art involved.2 A count which is not ambiguous ordinarily is interpreted as broadly as its language will permit .
Interference Issue ; Interpretation of Counts Important at all stages is the interpretation of the interference ... in the art involved.2 A count which is not ambiguous ordinarily is interpreted as broadly as its language will permit .
23. lappuse
Means for performing any function will be interpreted as including all elements contributing thereto regardless of number or kind . But a double reading of a single element of the disclosure may be unacceptable .
Means for performing any function will be interpreted as including all elements contributing thereto regardless of number or kind . But a double reading of a single element of the disclosure may be unacceptable .
116. lappuse
rectly involved from cases in which that question is involved only as affecting the interpretation of interference counts . In cases of the latter type a different rule applies when a count is derived from a claim of an existing patent ...
rectly involved from cases in which that question is involved only as affecting the interpretation of interference counts . In cases of the latter type a different rule applies when a count is derived from a claim of an existing patent ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ