No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 29.
22. lappuse
Interference Issue ; Interpretation of Counts Important at all stages is the interpretation of the interference ... in the art involved.2 A count which is not ambiguous ordinarily is interpreted as broadly as its language will permit .
Interference Issue ; Interpretation of Counts Important at all stages is the interpretation of the interference ... in the art involved.2 A count which is not ambiguous ordinarily is interpreted as broadly as its language will permit .
23. lappuse
Means for performing any function will be interpreted as including all elements contributing thereto regardless of number or kind . But a double reading of a single element of the disclosure may be unacceptable .
Means for performing any function will be interpreted as including all elements contributing thereto regardless of number or kind . But a double reading of a single element of the disclosure may be unacceptable .
116. lappuse
rectly involved from cases in which that question is involved only as affecting the interpretation of interference counts . In cases of the latter type a different rule applies when a count is derived from a claim of an existing patent ...
rectly involved from cases in which that question is involved only as affecting the interpretation of interference counts . In cases of the latter type a different rule applies when a count is derived from a claim of an existing patent ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
45 JPOS 49 CCPA 50 CCPA 56 JPOS 72 USPQ 99 USPQ adversary adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment application award of priority Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Comr Commissioner of Patents Company copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision disclaimer disclosure Double Patenting Edison S.P.A. effect estoppel evidence F.Supp failure ference filing date final hearing infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd motion to dissolve motion under Rule MPEP Natta notice old Rule party's Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation record reduction to practice refusal requisites res judicata S.Ct SDNY senior party Sockman specification Sperry Rand subject matter supra terminal disclaimer tion USPQ