No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 86.
26. lappuse
When an interference is found to exist and the applications are in condition therefore , the primary examiner is required to : 1 ( a ) ... forward the files to the Board of Patent Interferences together with a statement indicating the ...
When an interference is found to exist and the applications are in condition therefore , the primary examiner is required to : 1 ( a ) ... forward the files to the Board of Patent Interferences together with a statement indicating the ...
29. lappuse
( 3 ) a request of the primary examiner when he is of the opinion that an action should be made independently of the interference proceeding ; this may be for the purpose of a ruling pertaining to the declaration of another interference ...
( 3 ) a request of the primary examiner when he is of the opinion that an action should be made independently of the interference proceeding ; this may be for the purpose of a ruling pertaining to the declaration of another interference ...
31. lappuse
Advancing Interference : Making " Special " Applications are sometimes advanced for examination out of turn under Rule 102 ; in other words , made special . " If such an application become involved in an 12 interference ...
Advancing Interference : Making " Special " Applications are sometimes advanced for examination out of turn under Rule 102 ; in other words , made special . " If such an application become involved in an 12 interference ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ