No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 9.
70. lappuse
145 merely reverses the previous rejection and authorizes but does not direct the issuance of a patent , and leaves the Commissioner free to interpose any legal bar that he may discover . Commonwealth Engineering Co. v .
145 merely reverses the previous rejection and authorizes but does not direct the issuance of a patent , and leaves the Commissioner free to interpose any legal bar that he may discover . Commonwealth Engineering Co. v .
126. lappuse
( The downshifts from overdrive direct to overdrive second to second are obtained as follows : Assuming the vehicle to be operating between 5 to 40 m.p.h. in overdrive direct , depression of the accelerator pedal 219 to kickdown ...
( The downshifts from overdrive direct to overdrive second to second are obtained as follows : Assuming the vehicle to be operating between 5 to 40 m.p.h. in overdrive direct , depression of the accelerator pedal 219 to kickdown ...
156. lappuse
A variable speed transmission comprising in combination a countershaft type unit having low , second and direct drive ratios , and a planetary type unit having direct drive and overdrive ratios , automatically controlled means for ...
A variable speed transmission comprising in combination a countershaft type unit having low , second and direct drive ratios , and a planetary type unit having direct drive and overdrive ratios , automatically controlled means for ...
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Saturs
PAGE | v |
B v C Interference 855 0 G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Hezler 476 F 2d 1005 177 USPQ 458 | xxxvii |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS abandonment action adversary amendment appeal application award Board Brenner CADC CCPA Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Company considered copy Corp Corporation counts Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision determination disclosure dissolve distinguished earlier effect entitled establish evidence F.Supp fact failure ference filing filing date final hearing followed grounds held holding infra inter interference interpretation invention inventor involving JPOS judgment junior jurisdiction limitations means motion notice old Rule operation Patent Appeals Patent Office petition preliminary statement present primary examiner priority of invention procedure proceedings Products Public question reasons record reduction to practice reference refusal relating request requisites res adjudicata SDNY senior party showing Smith specification steps subject matter supra taking Term termination testimony tion United USPQ