Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 4.
130. lappuse
... cross beams 14 , 14 , according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ... beams and maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with re- spect to each other " ) and 9 ( " a plurality of ...
... cross beams 14 , 14 , according to the specification of the Junior Party , is accomplished by clips 26 , 26 ... beams and maintaining said cross beams in parallel relation with re- spect to each other " ) and 9 ( " a plurality of ...
137. lappuse
... cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other " renders the claim misdescriptive . The cross beams , which are described as " parallel spaced overlapping cross beams " , are defined as " mounted for engagement within ...
... cross beams in parallel relation with respect to each other " renders the claim misdescriptive . The cross beams , which are described as " parallel spaced overlapping cross beams " , are defined as " mounted for engagement within ...
138. lappuse
... cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation . The idea of the thing supported maintaining the support is comparable to that of lifting one's self by one's own bootstraps . The ...
... cross beams is to support the panels which form the stopping and to maintain them in arranged relation . The idea of the thing supported maintaining the support is comparable to that of lifting one's self by one's own bootstraps . The ...
Saturs
Introduction | lxxi |
Steps Subsequqent to Declaration and Prior | 5 |
Interference Issue Interpretation of Counts | 22 |
Autortiesības | |
13 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
50 CCPA 56 JPOS 99 USPQ adversary adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment assignee Attorneys award of priority Board erred Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC CCPA Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commonwealth Engineering Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision declaration of interference disclosure Double Patenting Edison S.P.A. effect estoppel evidence F.Supp failure ference filing date final hearing infra inter interference counts Interference Examiners interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior jurisdiction motion to dissolve motion under Rule MPEP N.D. Ill Natta notice old Rule panels Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reasons of appeal record reduction to practice refusal requisites res judicata SDNY senior party specification Sperry Rand subject matter supra Switzer terminal disclaimer tion USPQ ССРА