Outline of Patent Office Interference Practice1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 35.
55. lappuse
... considered , and when one of the parties to the interference is a patentee , no motion to dissolve on the ground that the subject matter of the count is un- patentable to all parties or is unpatentable to the patentee will be considered ...
... considered , and when one of the parties to the interference is a patentee , no motion to dissolve on the ground that the subject matter of the count is un- patentable to all parties or is unpatentable to the patentee will be considered ...
62. lappuse
... considered by the primary examiner will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference . ' Motions ; Procedure Generally All such motions , i.e. , motions ...
... considered by the primary examiner will not be considered . " Thus , there is no motion period in an interference de- clared on motion in a previous interference . ' Motions ; Procedure Generally All such motions , i.e. , motions ...
159. lappuse
... considered conflicting registra- tions presented for the first time upon the hearing of an intra - office appeal from the decision of the Examiner . Quoting from the opinion of this Court ( p . 998 ) : " No notice was given by appellee ...
... considered conflicting registra- tions presented for the first time upon the hearing of an intra - office appeal from the decision of the Examiner . Quoting from the opinion of this Court ( p . 998 ) : " No notice was given by appellee ...
Saturs
PAGE | ix |
Eastern Air Lines 311 F 2d 156 136 USPQ | xx |
B v C Interference 855 O G 16 Com Pats | xxviii |
Autortiesības | |
26 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
36 CCPA 45 JPOS 49 CCPA 52 CCPA 56 JPOS 72 USPQ 99 USPQ action adversary adversary's aff'd affidavits amendment assignee award of priority Board of Patent Brenner burden of proof CADC Chemical claims Com'r Pats Commissioner of Patents Commissioner's Company copy Corp Court of Customs Customs and Patent decision disclosure Double Patenting Edison S.P.A. estoppel evidence F.Supp failure ference final hearing infra inter interference examiner interference issue interference proceeding inventor inventorship involving judgment junior jurisdiction L.Ed Ladd Manual motion to dissolve motion under Rule MPEP Natta notice old Rule Patent Appeals Patent Interferences Patent Office petition preliminary statement primary examiner prior art priority of invention proposed Count question Radio Corporation reduction to practice reissue requisites res judicata Rule 94 S.Ct SDNY senior party Sockman Sperry Rand subject matter supra Switzer terminal disclaimer tion USPQ 149 Bd ССРА