Patent Office Papers: 1914-1917, 4. sējumsPatent Office Society, 1912 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 11.
5. lappuse
... interference because of the fact that knowledge and use of an invention abroad is no bar to a patent in the United States and therefore is incompetent matter to be shown and considered in an interference proceeding . In this way the ...
... interference because of the fact that knowledge and use of an invention abroad is no bar to a patent in the United States and therefore is incompetent matter to be shown and considered in an interference proceeding . In this way the ...
8. lappuse
... analogous to the practice in interference cases , where the examiner retains jurisdiction of the case until the Examiner of Interferences declares the interference by forwarding the notices to the several parties to the proceedings 8 .
... analogous to the practice in interference cases , where the examiner retains jurisdiction of the case until the Examiner of Interferences declares the interference by forwarding the notices to the several parties to the proceedings 8 .
5. lappuse
... interference proceeding is an affidavit under the meaning of Rule 75 and should be received as such ( Ex parte Keller , 61 O. G. , 1790 ) . Affidavits filed by a party under Rule 75 should be sealed up or removed from the file before ...
... interference proceeding is an affidavit under the meaning of Rule 75 and should be received as such ( Ex parte Keller , 61 O. G. , 1790 ) . Affidavits filed by a party under Rule 75 should be sealed up or removed from the file before ...
9. lappuse
... interference in fact . The Dodge case having got to issue , the examiner was ... proceeding . " Neither the spirit of the law nor public policy sanctions the ... interference between two or more applica- tions whenever any one or more of ...
... interference in fact . The Dodge case having got to issue , the examiner was ... proceeding . " Neither the spirit of the law nor public policy sanctions the ... interference between two or more applica- tions whenever any one or more of ...
12. lappuse
... interference was proper . If the applicant having the narrow claim does not choose to contest the interference , he can easily avoid such a proceeding by filing a disclaimer under Rule 107. For the applicant having the broad claim , as ...
... interference was proper . If the applicant having the narrow claim does not choose to contest the interference , he can easily avoid such a proceeding by filing a disclaimer under Rule 107. For the applicant having the broad claim , as ...
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
abandonment action aggregation amendment apparatus assignment attorney broad claim Circuit Court cited combination Commissioner construction construed Court of Appeals covered decision described device disclosed Division divisional application doctrine doctrine of equivalents drawing effect electric elements entitled Examiners-in-Chief Examining Corps fact filed follows foreign application foreign country foreign patent function Gebrauchsmuster held improvement infringement interference interference proceeding invention or discovery inventor involved issue joinder LAW REPORTER PRINTING letters patent limited machine manufacture matter means Medart ment monopoly novelty oath office classification operation paper party patent granted patent law practice present Principal Examiner principle printed publication prior art produce proper prosecution purpose question reason record reduction to practice reference reissue reissue application REPORTER PRINTING COMPANY res adjudicata result Revised Statutes Rule 46 Section Supreme Court thereof tion trade-mark transfer U. S. Patent Office United States Patent vention Westinghouse
Populāri fragmenti
8. lappuse - ... in case of a machine, he shall explain the principle thereof, and the best mode in which he has contemplated applying that principle, so as to distinguish it from other inventions ; and he shall particularly point out and distinctly claim the part, improvement, or combination which he claims as his invention or discovery.
24. lappuse - ... in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art or science to which it appertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make, construct, compound, and use the same...
9. lappuse - ... improvement thereof not known or used by others in this country and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country, before his invention or discovery thereof, and not in public use or on sale for more than two years prior to his application, unless the same is proved to have been abandoned, may, upon payment of the fees required by law, and other due proceedings had, obtain a patent therefor.
15. lappuse - That he had surreptitiously or unjustly obtained the patent for that which was in fact invented by another, who was using reasonable diligence in adapting and perfecting the same; or, Third.
13. lappuse - ... not known or used by others in this country before his invention or discovery thereof, and not patented or described in any printed publication in this or any foreign country before his invention or discovery thereof...
17. lappuse - ... by reason of its having been first patented or caused to be patented by the inventor or his legal representatives. or assigns in a foreign country, unless the application for said foreign patent was filed more than twelve months...
27. lappuse - A registered mark or a mark for which application to register has been filed shall be assignable with the good will of the business in which the mark is used...
19. lappuse - ... has not been patented in any country foreign to the United States on an application filed by him or his legal representatives or assigns more than twelve months prior to this application; and that no application for patent on said invention has been filed by him or his representatives or assigns in any country foreign to the United States...