Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

he does not dispose of it, unless it is given to "A B and his heirs." These last words, which are commonly called words of inheritance, must always be added; for although there are some qualifications to this rule, which might help those who take such a deed inadvertently, there are none to which it would be safe to trust.

The deed is terminated by this clause of execution: "In witness whereof, I, the said A B, on the day of in the year, have hereunto set my hand and seal," or "subscribed (or written) my name and affixed my seal." And there should be no departure from this, although an exact adherence to this formula may not be necessary to the validity of the deed. This clause is often called the "In Testimonium clause."

If the deed contains nothing but what has now been said, it will convey the land, or all the right, title, and interest in and to the land, possessed by the grantor. But it is only what is called a quitclaim deed. That is, it is not a warranty deed. These phrases, which are in common use, explain themselves. Originally, a quitclaim deed was intended, and indeed operated, only where the grantee already held possession of the land, or some title to it, and the grantor intended to renounce all his right or title in favor of the grantee. But it was soon used where a man intended to sell and convey land, but not to give any warranty. And now, because there is some question, in some of our States, as to the effect of the words "give, grant, sell, and convey," although there be no express warranty in the deed, it is best, and it is usual, when only a quitclaim is intended, without any warranty whatever, to substitute for the words of conveyance above mentioned the words "grant and quitclaim," or, more accurately, "release and quitclaim.' Then, if the grantee afterwards loses the land because the grantor had no title to it, the grantor is nevertheless under no responsibility, provided the transaction was an honest one on his part.

All purchasers, therefore, desire to have a warranty deed if they can get one. And a deed becomes a warranty deed, when clauses like those which follow are inserted just before the clause of execution:

"And I, the said A B (the grantor), for myself, my heirs,

executors, and administrators, do covenant with the said CD (the grantee), his heirs and assigns, that I am lawfully seized in fee of the aforegranted premises; that they are free from all incumbrances; that I have good right to sell and convey the same to the said C D as aforesaid; and that I will, and my heirs, executors, and administrators shall, warrant and defend the same to the said C D, his heirs and assigns forever, against the lawful claims and demands of all persons.

It will be noticed that this paragraph contains four different agreements or warranties,-covenants the law calls them. The cases are multitudinous, and the law excessively nice, as to their exact meaning and operation. None of this technical learning is it worth while to spread before the general reader. But the general purpose and effect of all of them together should be stated. It is, that if "the said C D," that is, the grantee, or his heirs or assigns, are turned out of that estate (ousted or evicted, the law says), on the ground that the grantor had no title, or an incumbered title, and could not convey any good and clear title, he or they may fall back on the grantor or his heirs, and demand damages for the loss of the land.

It is a question how much damage a grantee thus ousted shall recover. In most of our States, it seems to be the money paid for it, with interest (deducting rents and profits), and the legal costs and charges (not including counsel fees) for defending against the suit which has ousted him from the land, an no more. But in other States, as generally in New England, the party ousted recovers the actual value of the land, with his improvements, which he loses by the defect of the grantor's title; although this may be much more than he paid for it. It is not, however, settled uniformly what the measure of damages is.

In forms of deeds there is usually a blank of a few lines left after the words "incumbrances;" and this is intended for the insertion of any mortgage, or other incumbrance, which may exist; thus, "excepting a mortgage to, etc., dated, etc., to secure the sum of, etc." Or, "excepting a right in the owners of the adjoining land to have and maintain a drain running, etc."

Sometimes quitclaim deeds are made with this warranty: "And I will, and my heirs, etc., shall, warrant and defend, etc.,

to the said C. D, etc., against all claims and demands of myself, or of any persons deriving title by or through me." Such a warranty will hold the grantor and his heirs liable for any incumbrance made or suffered by him, but not for any other.

As the usual covenants of a warranty deed are made with the grantee, "his heirs and assigns," if such grantee conveys the land only by grant and quitclaim, without warranty, his grantee takes the benefit of all the previous warranties to which this last grantor was entitled. Thus, A sells with warranty to B; B quitclaims to C; C is ousted by D, who proves that he has a better title than A. C cannot sue B because he got no warranty from B; but he can sue A on A's warranty to B, which was transferred to C.

Sometimes estates are conveyed on condition; but this is a very catching thing, and nobody should ever take such a deed if he can help it. It is hardly safe to have the word condition in any deed but a mortgage. The reason is, that if an estate is conveyed on condition, and the condition is broken, the estate is lost. Thus if land is sold on a certain street with this clause: "And the land aforesaid is sold on condition that neither the grantee, nor any one deriving title from or through him, shall build within ten feet of the street." If any owner build six inches over the line, by mistake, or extend his building by an addition of a foot or so in any part, the whole land, house and all, might be lost and forfeited to the grantor. And the grantor can always secure the proper effect of such a conditio a by a clause like this: "Provided, however, and it is agreed, that if the said C D, etc., shall build, etc., the said A B, or his heirs or assigns, may enter upon the land hereby conveyed, and abate and remove any and all buildings or parts of buildings, which stand nearer said street than the limit of ten feet aforesaid;"—or some similar clause, as might be framed to suit the This would be just as good for the grantor and a great deal safer for the grantee.

case.

By a rule of law which originated in this country, and is now universal here, if a married woman holds lands, the hus band and the wife, joining in one deed, may convey them. In some of our States such a deed is regulated by statutes, which

of course are to be followed. And in many of them the wife now has peculiar powers by statute, as stated in Chapter V. on Married Women. It may be necessary that she should renounce or release certain rights, as of homestead, etc., under these statutes, if it is intended that the grantee should take a clear title; and in such case proper words should be inserted. This is now the custom, for example, in Massachusetts. She should always release her right of dower, unless it is intended that she should preserve it. In some States her signing the deed with her husband does not release anything, even if it could be proved that such was her intention, unless the deed contain words expressing her intention to release or convey such or such a right or interest. In most printed forms there is a blank left to be filled up for this purpose. As this differs in different States I shall refer to it again.

It may be well to remark that bargains are often made for the purchase and sale of real property. If the contract be oral only, it has no force in any court. If it be in writing, either party may, in a court of law, recover damages from the other if he refuses to perform his contract. Or, in a court of equity, he nay compel the other to execute his contract. Not, however, if there was fraud in the contract, or oppression, or gross inisrepresentation, or intentional and important concealment. But a mere inadequacy of price-all things being honest-will not prevent a court of equity from enforcing such an agreement.

Deeds conveying land are of vast variety. They not only differ that they may suit the particular purposes of the parties and the terms of their bargain, but those used in each section of the country differ somewhat in form from those used in another; and different conveyancers in the same State prefer one form to another. But these differences are generally, if not always, differences only of form, and are seldom essential to the meaning and effect of the deeds. I give here forms of all the kinds most in use; and in such variety, and so selected and prepared, that it is believed that any person in any part of this country will be able to find a form, which, either as it stands, or with such alterations as can be readily seen to be required by the use he would make of it, will be safe, and suffi. cient for his purpose.

As acknowledgments differ much in form, enough them are given to show the kinds that are used. The fuller and more particular are the safer, although the shorter and more general might be sufficient.

In New England, a deed of land is usually what is called in law a Deed Poll; by which is meant a deed of one party, and from him to another. In the other States generally, a deed of lands is more commonly in the form of an Indenture, which, as has been said before, is an instrument between two or more parties. The difference between them will be seen in the forms given. The first one is a Deed Poll. But most of them are Indentures, as they are most frequently used; although a Deed Poll that was satisfactory in other respects would generally suffice to give good title to land anywhere.

A form of a Deed Poll may be converted into an Indenture by changing the beginning of it in the manner shown in the forms, and, whenever the word "grantor" comes, changing that into "the party of the first part." And a deed by Indenture is made a Deed Poll by changes of an opposite kind. How to make these changes will be seen by comparing the deeds of the two kinds as herein given.

Another difference between the Deeds Poll in common use in the New England States, and the deeds by Indenture in use elsewhere, must be noticed.

If the grantor by a Deed Poll has a wife, and it is intended that she shall relinquish her dower, she is not mentioned as grantor, but in the "In Testimonium," so called, which is that part of the deed which begins with "In witness (or in testimony) whereof," her name is mentioned, and it must be distinctly said. that she signs the deed in token of her relinquishment or release of dower. This is shown in Form 106. But where deeds by Indenture are used, there she is joined with her hus band, and named as grantor; he and she being "parties of the first part." It is, however, not necessary that anything should be said in the deed about her release of dower, or homestead; but she signs and seals the deed, and, in the acknowledgment, express mention is made of her release of dower and homestead, and also that she was separately examined. Some

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »