Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

CASES CITED.

(A reference to all the Reports will be found under each citation.)

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

BABCOCK V. Lawson, 74
Bailey v. Sweeting, 19
Baldey v. Parker, 143

Barr v. Gibson, 36, 40
Barrow v. Arnaud, 129, 132, 140
Beer v. Walker, 45, 93
Behn v. Burness, 31, 38, 138
Bentley v. Vilmont, 9, 74, 75
Bethell v. Clark, 109, 111, 114, 119
Biddlecombe v. Bond, 150
Bigge v. Parkinson, 42, 46
Bilton v. Crofts, 150
Bird v. Brown, 116
Blenkinsop v. Clayton, 18

Bloxam v. Saunders, 80, 81, 82, 101,
103, 104, 105, 107, 122
Bodger v. Nichols, 142
Bolton v. Lanc. & Y. Rly. Co., 108,
110, 115, 118

Boorman v. Nash, 128, 133
Borries v. Hutchinson, 131, 134
Borrowman v. Drayton, 31, 38
Bowes v. Shand, 31, 35, 38

Bowlby v. Bell, 20

Boydell v. Drummond, 19

Bradford v. Williams, 31

Brady v. Oastler, 132
Brogden v. M. Rly. Co., 15
Brown v. Edgington, 43
v. Muller, 133

Browne v. Hare, 63, 66
Bryan v. Lewis, 21
Buckman v. Levi, 92
Buddle v. Green, 80, 83, 130
Bull v. Robison, 93

Burnby v. Bollett, 40

Bute v. Thompson, 21

Buxton v. Rust, 19

[blocks in formation]

Cazet de la Borde v. Othon, 137
Chalmers, Ex parte, 99
Chambers v. Davidson, 108
Chanter v. Hopkins, 35, 149
Chinery v. Viall, 56, 82, 130
Clarke v. Hutchins, 92
v. Westrope, 28
Clifford v. Watts, 22
Col. Ins. Co. v. Adelaide, 31, 86
Cooper, Ex parte, 85, 107, 114, 117
Cort v. Ambergate Rly. Co., 128
Couston v. Chapman, 33, 97
Couturier v. Hastie, 21, 23
Cox v. Mayor, &c., of London, 7
Crane v. London Dock Co., 71
Cundy v. Lindsay, 69, 73
Cunliffe v. Harrison, 87

Cusack v. Robinson, 18, 91

Bradley v. Holdsworth, 20

DALE v. Humfrey, 19

[blocks in formation]

GABARRON v. Kreeft, 65
Gardiner v. Gray, 36, 46

Gilmour v. Supple, 55, 56
Gladstone v. Padwick, 78

Godts v. Rose, 18, 52, 53, 64, 66, 84
Goodhart v. Lowe, 122

Greaves v. Ashlin, 98

Grébert-Borgnis v. Nugent, 130, 135, 140

Green v. Baverstock, 144

Grice v. Richardson, 105, 106
Grimoldby v. Wells, 97

Gunn v. Bolckow, Vaughan & Co., 7, 100

HADLEY v. Baxendale, 128, 130, 132 Hall v. Conder, 35

Hammond v. Bussey, 130
Hanson v. Meyer, 58, 105
Hargreave v. Spink, 72
Harman v. Bennett, 45
v. Reeve, 17

Harnor v. Groves, 95
Hart v. Mills, 87

Hastie v. Couturier, 20

Head v. Tattersall, 25, 59, 67 Heilbutt v. Hickson, 13, 32, 50, 94, 95, 96, 138

Heseltine v. Siggers, 20

Hewison v. Guthrie, 108

Heyworth v. Hutchinson, 32, 48, 138
Hibblewhite v. M'Morine, 21, 48
Hills v. Sughrue, 21, 22, 23
Hinde v. Liddell, 131, 134
Hoadly v. M'Laine, 19, 26, 27
Hoare v. Rennie, 31, 85, 86
Honck v. Muller, 32, 86
Horncastle v. Farran, 108
Horwood v. Smith, 75

Howell v. Coupland, 22, 25
Humble v. Mitchell, 20

Hydraulic Eng. Co. v. M'Haffie, 134, 135, 140

[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Laing v. Fidgeon, 42, 44
Laird v. l'im, 126, 127
Lamond v. Devalle, 124
Lee v. Butler, 77
Leigh v. Patterson, 128, 131
Levy v. Green, 88

Lickbarrow v. Mason, 109, 118
Lockett v. Nicklin, 16, 29, 81
Logan v. Le Mesurier, 55, 58
Lord v. Price, 103, 122
Lorymer v. Smith, 21, 48
Lucas v. Dixon, 19

Lucy v. Mouflet, 97

Lyons v. Hoffnung, 109, 112

[blocks in formation]

Paliner v. Johnson, 5
Pandorf v. Hamilton, 8
Parfitt v. Jepson, 145

Parker v. Gossage, 150
v. Palmer, 47

Parkinson v. Lee, 42, 49, 51

Pawle v. Gunn, 20

Payne v. Cave, 143
Paynter v. James, 82
Pearson v. Pearson, 5
Perkins v. Bell, 96
Pettit v. Mitchell, 48, 94
Phelps v. Comber, 119
Philpotts v. Evans, 128

[merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[blocks in formation]

THE

SALE OF GOODS ACT, 1893

INTRODUCTION.

THE Sale of Goods Act, which after some five years has at last been added to the statute book, marks an important step towards the codification of that part of the common law which deals with and regulates mercantile transactions. Originally introduced by Lord Herschell about 1888, it has been before the Legislature on some three or four occasions, and though it has been from time to time altered and amended, it remains still what it originally professed to be, a substantially complete declaration of the existing law, and of the existing customs which have been formally recognized by judicial decisions, relating to the sale of goods, wares, and merchandise.

The Act itself closely follows the lines upon which the Bills of Exchange Act, 1882, was framed. The Bills of Exchange Act codified and declared the statute and case law relating to bills

N.S.G.

B

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »