AMENDMENTS TO RULES SUPREME COURT OF RHODE ISLAND Rule 8 of the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court is hereby amended so as to read as follows: 8. Complaints against members of the bar for unprofessional conduct shall be made in writing and shall set forth specifically the facts upon which the charge is based. Such complaints when filed with the clerk will be referred for examination and report thereon to a standing committee of five members of the bar appointed by the court. Said committee shall also examine all suggestions of unprofessional conduct brought to its attention by the Supreme or superior courts, and | in its discretion make such reports as to it seems advisable: Provided, that where action is recommended the report shall be made to the Supreme Court. The members of the present committee shall hold office until the expiration of their respective terms of appointment, and vacancies as they occur hereafter will be filled by appointments for the term of three years. The members of this committee will be excused from attendance in court when necessary to fulfill engagements previously made to attend meetings of this committee. (Adopted December 20, 1907.) viii. Aston, Commonwealth v. (Pa.). .1017 Bliss v. Junkins (Me.). 386 .1019 888 ..... Aston, Commonwealth v. (Pa.). Austin, Morris County Brick Co. v. (N. J. 819 550 Axtell, Harrison v. (N. J.)... Ayers v. Tenny (R. I.). .1100 County, Hermann & Grace v. (N. J.).....1101 Board of Chosen Freeholders of Hudson County, Dashe v. (N. J. Sup.).. Board of Education of City of Newark, Schwitzer v. (N. J. Sup.).. 765 447 506 Bain v. Petroleum Iron Works Co. (Pa.).. 604 341 Board of Engineers of Portland Fire Department, Nelson v. (Me.). 64 Baker & Sons, Richardson v. (Vt.). 151 Ballantine v. Young (N. J.). .1100 Ballou v. Ballou (R. I.).. 97 Baltimore Pearl Hominy Co. v. Linthicum Board of Equalization of Taxes of State of 748 432 (Md.) 737 Baltimore & O. R. Co. v. Dever (Md.) 352 Board of Tenement House Supervision v. Gruber (N. J. Sup.). 475 Baltimore & O. R. Co., Musgrove v. (Md.) 245 Banfield, Weitz v. (Pa.). 357 Bangor & A. R. Co., Currie v. (Me.). Booth v. McGuinness (N. J.)........ Borough of Allendale, Cook v., two cases 51 (N. J. Sup.). 455 769 ...... Bannerot v. Davidson (Pa.). 417 Banning, Cooper & Co. v. Murphy (Pa.).. 852 Borough of Allendale, Naugle v. (N. J. Sup.) 769 ... Borough of Brackenridge, C. L. Flaccus Gless Co. v. (Pa.)... 36 Borough of Etna, Graham v. (N. J. Sup.) 749 744 ...1090 Batchelder, Wiley v. (Me.) 75 A 47 ............... Borough of North Arlington, City of Bayonne v. (N. J. Ch.)... 558 ....... ....... 6 134 Borough of North Arlington, New York & N. J. Water Co. v. (N. J. Ch.).. 177 (vii) Borough of Spring Lake v. Polak (N. J. Page 753 103 Boston, Gibson v. (N. H.), 103 120 City of Derby, Cooper v. (Conn.). 531 140 705 Bretthauer v. Jacobson (N. J. Sup.). 560 City of Elizabeth, Levy v. (N. J. Sup.).... 312 840 792 City of Newark v. Chestnut Hill Land Co. (N. J. Ch.).... 644 (Conn.): 709 Bronson v. President, etc., of Mechanics' 709 Brown v. Columbus (N. J. Ch.). 917 Brown v. Dickey (Me.). 382 City of New Haven, Neal v. (Conn.). 708 ... .1101 Brown, Kruger v. (N. J. Sup.). Brown v. Spence (N. J. Sup.). Bryant, King v. (R. I.).. 154 Bubeck v. Pennsylvania R. Co. (N. J. Sup.) 444 (Del. Super.) 872 Buchwald Delivery & Express Co. of Balti 171 City of Orange, W. A. Manda v. (N. J.)... 741 662 956 Buck v. McKeesport (Pa.).. 840 Buckman v. Philadelphia & R. R. Co. (Pa.) Bullitt v. Hinchman (Pa.). .1069 City of Pittsburg, O'Donnell v. (Pa.). 959 945 114 .1035 City of Pittsburg, Pittsburg, A. & M. Traction Co. v. (Pa.). 665 415 City of Pittsburg, Pittsburg Rys. Co. v. (Pa.) 681 |