Lapas attēli
PDF
ePub

REVIEW OF PROMOTIONS OF OFFICERS
IN THE ARMED SERVICES

HEARINGS

BEFORE THE

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES
HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

EIGHTY-THIRD CONGRESS

FIRST SESSION

MARCH 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 16, 18, 19, 25, 26, 30, 31, APRIL 1, MAY 29,
JUNE 1, 22, 24, 26, 29, JULY 20, AND AUGUST 3, 1953

[ocr errors][subsumed]

Printed for the use of the Committee on Armed Services.

the

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]

2925

2646

2925

Smoot, Rear Adm. R. N., Assistant Chief of Personnel Control.

2301,

2311, 2351, 2385

Stewart, Lt. Col. L. L., Office of Assistant Chief of Staff, Personnel.. 2925

Sundell, Col. W. A., Assistant Comptroller for Plans and Interna-
tional Affairs, USAF.

2629

2429

2549

Waterhouse, Capt. J. W., assistant head of distribution.
Wensinger, Maj. W. W., Deputy Chief of Staff, USMC-
Wetzel, Maj. Gen. E. S., Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, United
States Air Force..
2589, 2625, 2659, 2685, 2715, 2731, 2763
Wheeler, Comdr. R. V., Jr., head, current plan section..
Letters, statements, memoranda, etc., submitted for the record-

2282

Blandford, John R., information requested from each of the armed

services showing number of generals, colonels, and lieutenant colo-
nels, or their respective counterparts:

Air Force, furnished by Brig. Gen. Joe W. Kelly-
Army, furnished by Col. Clair B. Mitchell..

2768

2772

Navy, furnished by Comdr. R. V. Wheeler, Jr..

2768

IV

Letters, statements, memoranda, etc., submitted for the record—Con.
Burke, Lt. Col. Mark J., Directorate of Manpower and Organization,
USAF

Air Force Establishment, chart...

Air Staff, immediate headquarters, chart.
Typical major air command, chart.

Page

2599

2604

2613

Officer strength nearly doubled between June 1950 and February
1953_

2430

Department of the Army, supplemental statement to questions
asked on August 3, 1953-

2934

Four general questions submitted to Admiral Houser_

2281

Lee, Maj. Gen. Morris J., Director of Personnel Planning, United
States Air Force, information on staff officers.

2903

Officers who served in the Regular Army, April 6, 1917, to November
11, 1918, also emergency grades attained

[blocks in formation]

Wetzel, Maj. Gen. E. S., Deputy Chief of Staff, Personnel, USAF:

Air Force chaplains, Chief and Deputy Chief

2705

Air provost marshal..

2695

Breakdowns of typical training command stations, that is, Samp-

son, Keesler, Williams, and Nellis..

2738

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

REVIEW OF PROMOTIONS OF OFFICERS IN THE

ARMED SERVICES

THURSDAY, MARCH 5, 1953

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES,

SUBCOMMITTEE No. 2 OF THE
COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES,
Washington, D. C.

The subcommittee met at 10 a. m., Hon. Leslie C. Arends (chairman of the subcommittee) presiding.

Mr. ARENDS. The committee will come to order.

In preparation for these hearings, I would like to read this short statement, for the record.

I would like to make a statement before we hear from the Navy witnesses, who will begin these hearings.

First, let me say that these hearings will be in executive session, although they will be recorded. Obviously, we will be discussing security material throughout most of the hearings, particularly when the various billets occupied by colonels and generals, or their equivalent, are explained to the subcommittee.

Thus, I must ask all persons who are not directly connected with these hearings in an official capacity to please leave the room at this time.

As you all know, it is the intent of this subcommittee to thoroughly review the present promotion policies for officers in our Armed Forces. We are, of course, particularly concerned with temporary promotions, although in some instances we will discuss permanent promotions.

I want to say at the outset that we have not prejudged this case. I don't think any of us have made up our minds one way or the other as to whether or not there have been too many promotions and whether or not there are too many persons holding high grades in the Armed Forces. At the same time, I think it must be apparent to everyone that there is growing concern in the Congress with respect to temporary promotions and the number of officers holding high grades compared with the number that were in existence during World War II.

I don't think it is possible for us or for the Congress to say whether or not there has been any abuse of promotions, or whether there are too many or too few general or flag officers, or too many or too few colonels, until we know what all of you officers in those grades are doing. I want to make it clear that one of the principal things this committee will inquire into is whether the rank should go with the job, or whether the rank should go with length of service and experience. In other words, it will be up to you people to convince us as to the reasonable length of service that should be required of an officer before he occupies a higher rank.

« iepriekšējāTurpināt »