Privacy: The Collection, Use, and Computerization of Personal Data : Joint Hearings Before the Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Privacy and Information Systems of the Committee on Government Operations and the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary, United States Senate, Ninety-third Congress, Second Session ... June 18, 19, and 20, 1974, 2. daļa
United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Ad Hoc Subcommittee on Privacy and Information Systems
U.S. Government Printing Office, 1974 - 2335 lappuses
Lietotāju komentāri - Rakstīt atsauksmi
Ierastajās vietās neesam atraduši nevienu atsauksmi.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
action activities administrative agency Amendment American application arrest authorized become believe bill Bureau citizens civil Code collection Committee communication concern confidentiality Congress constitutional consumer contained court Credit Reporting criminal criminal justice data banks decision Department designed determine disclosure dossiers effect employee established example executive existing fact Federal files freedom Hearings House identify important individual industry information systems interest involved issue legislation limited maintained matter means ment obtained Office operation organizations political possible practices present President problem procedures proposed protection question reason received records regulations relating request responsibility result returns rules Senate Service social society specific standards statement supra threat tion tort United violation Washington
1518. lappuse - ... (6) personnel and medical files and similar files the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy ; (7) Investigatory files compiled for law enforcement purposes except to the extent available by law to a party other than an agency...
1533. lappuse - States courts of any Territory or other place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, to enjoin such acts or practices, and upon a proper showing a permanent or temporary injunction or restraining order shall be granted without bond.
1517. lappuse - ... (B) statements of the general course and method by which its functions are channeled and determined, including the nature and requirements of all formal and informal procedures available; (C) rules of procedure, descriptions of forms available or the places at which forms may be obtained and instructions as to the scope and contents of all papers, reports, or examinations; (D) substantive rules of general applicability adopted as authorized by law, and statements of general policy or interpretations...
1520. lappuse - Subject to published rules of the agency and within its powers, employees presiding at hearings may (1) administer oaths and affirmations; (2) issue subpenas authorized by law; (3) rule on offers of proof and receive relevant evidence; (4) take depositions or have depositions taken when the ends of justice would be served...
2004. lappuse - Experience should teach us to be most on our guard to protect liberty when the Government's purposes are beneficent. Men born to freedom are naturally alert to repel invasion of their liberty by evil-minded rulers. The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in insidious encroachment by men of zeal, well-meaning but without understanding.
1520. lappuse - Every party shall have the right to present his case or defense by oral or documentary evidence, to submit rebuttal evidence, and to conduct such cross-examination as may be required for a full and true disclosure of the facts.
1573. lappuse - Every person who having been summoned as a witness by the authority of either House of Congress to give testimony or to produce papers upon any matter under inquiry before either House...
1780. lappuse - It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.
1779. lappuse - Under the doctrine of Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 US 390, we think it entirely plain that the Act of 1922 unreasonably interferes with the liberty of parents and guardians to direct the upbringing and education of children under their control.