 | United States. Court of Claims, Audrey Bernhardt - 1958 - 910 lapas
...employees, the exclusive remedy of the owner of such invention or information shall be by suit against the United States in the Court of Claims or in the District Court of the United States for the district in which such owner is a resident for reasonable and entire compensation... | |
 | United States. Patent Office - 1955 - 172 lapas
...agency considers just compensation for the damage and/or use. A claimant may bring suit against the United States in the Court of Claims or in the District Court of the United States for the district in which such claimant is a resident for an amount which when... | |
 | United States. Office of Commissioner of Internal Revenue - 1916 - 312 lapas
...refunding of taxes paid on the "contingent interests " described in the act of June 27, 1902, tupra, it has been held that upon the rejection of the claim...Co. v. United States (45 C. Cls., 362, sc 222 US, 158); United States v. Jones (236 US, 106); Thacher v. United States (149 Fed., 902); United States... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1915 - 826 lapas
...Stat. 118, 120; June 25, 1910, c. 385, 36 Stat. 774, 779; August 26, 1912, c. 408, 37 Stat. 595, 626. It thus appears that the act of 1912 — upon which...the amount is within the prescribed limit). Fidelity Trusi Co. v. United States, 45 Ct. Cl. 362; SC, 222 US 158; United States v. Jones, 236 US 106; Thacher... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1915 - 854 lapas
...meaning of the provisions of the Tucker 'Act, now incorporated in the Judicial Code. See Medburyv. United States, 173 US 492, 497; McLean v. United States,...the amount is within the prescribed limit). Fidelity Trusi, Co. v. United States, 45 Ct. Cl. 362; SC, 222 US 158; United States v. Jones, 236 US 106; Thacher... | |
 | 1915 - 982 lapas
...Sup. Ct. Rep. 503; McLean v. United States, 226 US 374, 378, 57 L. ed. 260, 262, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 122. With respect to the refunding of taxes paid on the...against the United States in the court of claims, or la the district court (where the amount is within the prescribed limit). Fidelity Trust Co. v. United... | |
 | 1916 - 1384 lapas
...Code. See Medmiry TUS 173 US 492, 497; McLean v. US 226 US 374, 378, 33 S. Ct. 122, 57 US (I* ed.) 260. With respect to the refunding of taxes paid on the...within the prescribed limit). Fidelity Trust Co. v. US 45 Ct. Cl. 362, 222 US 158, 32 S. Ct. 59, 56 US (L. ed.) 137; US v. Jones, 236 US 106, 35 S. Ct.... | |
 | United States - 1927 - 506 lapas
...t tie exclusive remedy of the owner of such invention or information shall l>e by suit against the United States in the Court of Claims or in the District Court of the United States for the district in which such owner is a resident for reasonable and entire compensation... | |
 | United States - 1930 - 1514 lapas
...taxes for another year which were erroneously computed, a taxpayer's remedy is by action against the United States, in the Court of Claims or In the district court, under this section. Scmple v. Lewellyn (DC 1924), 1 F. CJd) 745. MILITARY LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES... | |
 | United States - 1971 - 1040 lapas
...agency considers just compensation for the damage and/or use. A claimant may bring suit against the United States in the Court of Claims or in the District Court of the United States for the district in which such claimant is a resident for an amount which when... | |
| |
... suit against the United States in the Court of Claims or in the District Court of the United States for the district in which such owner is a resident for reasonable and entire compensation for unauthorized use or disclosure. 
