ticular instance overstepped the limits of its jurisdiction. A just conception of all that is entailed in the performance of this duty, always important, often difficult and sometimes delicate, should call forth the highest powers and the finest moral and intellectual qualities, not only of the judge, but of the advocate. Such, I believe, has been your experience in the main; and it is fitting to note that principles established by the great jurist of a century ago who contributed so much to the wealth of your constitutional jurisprudence have not been restricted in their influence and application to your own country.

A strong love of individual liberty and a remarkable instinct and capacity for orderly government have gone hand in hand in the development of representative institutions among the Englishspeaking nations. Changes, whether constitutional or otherwise, have come not upon theory but of necessity; old forms and usages have gradually acquired new meanings to serve new needs; the instinct of the nation has taught it to tread warily and to trust in such matters to experience rather than to logic. And it is not amiss to remind you that, in the evolution of representative and responsible government in this country, Canadians of French descent have taken a great part and have been especially distinguished both by a fine knowledge of constitutional development and by a splendid grasp of constitutional principles.

There are those who doubt the permanence of existing systems of representative government as they have been developed in the English-speaking nations. Untouched by any such doubt and inspired with perfect confidence in a capacity for self-government which hitherto has not failed under test of the most searching experience, we must yet be mindful that the fabric of our national life rests upon no enduring foundation unless it is based upon a just conception of the duties and responsibilities of citizenship. I desire to offer my tribute of admiration and respect to those of your fellow citizens (and they include many distinguished members of your Association) who have consecrated their highest energies and abilities, often at great personal sacrifice, to the task of instilling lessons of civic and national duty, and who not infrequently have exemplified in the assumption of high and

arduous responsibilities one great ideal which they taught, the duty of service to the nation. Nor have they been unmindful of the truth that the national organization is not for those of today alone; institutions, laws, traditions, a boundless material heritage, all that has been committed to our keeping by those who have gone before is nevertheless impressed with a certain trust for those who are yet to be born.

With us as with you, the development of industry and of commerce, the marked progress and advancement in every field of national activity, the marvelous increase in wealth and the inequality of its distribution are attended with problems, the solution of which is sought insistently and even vehemently. Some of these problems are in reality no other than those with which Parliament has been confronted in the British Islands for the last four hundred years.

Today their importance is more gravely impressive and their solution is more urgently required by reason of the increasing stress and complexity of modern economic organization, and because the interests involved are of so vast and increasing a magnitude, and the results so momentous and far reaching. Yet they are in many cases the much-considered phenomena of the past, appearing perhaps in new guise and developed on a more tremendous and impressive scale.

Whether new or old, the problems of today are sufficiently complex to test the highest capacity for self-government. Seven centuries ago personal liberty, equality before the law and security of property were guaranteed by the great charter which is our common heritage. It is the high and difficult task of modern democracy to establish and maintain another charter not less enduring in its fame and in its results; namely, that to each individual there shall be accorded, so far as may be humanly possible, equality of opportunity in the national life.

Centuries ago "trial by battle" was recognized by our courts as a lawful method of determining disputes between individuals. Between the nations that old and barbarous method still survives in almost undiminished vigor. It has been urged that the highest widsom is not always exemplified by the making of

treaties which are in advance of public opinion. If this be true, there is the stronger reason to acknowledge with grateful thanks the work of those who have devoted their best energies to the task of teaching their fellow countrymen that war should cease to be the supreme arbiter between the nations, and that there is a nobler and wiser course.

Have we not before our eyes a notable, perhaps an unequalled, example of high international achievement. From neighboring coasts on which thunder the surges of the Atlantic to those distant shores where the West confronts the East across the vast expanse of the Pacific, the thousand-league boundary between these sister nations remains unguarded. On our great inland seas the busy fleets of commerce, not of war, ply to and fro.

It is fitting that nations should be thrilled by the memories of valiant deeds which in days gone by preserved and safeguarded land and liberty. But our hundred years' victory of peace was won by both nations and carries with it no gloom of defeat to either country. It is with profound thankfulness that we look back upon that century, not always free from differences or even from troublous days; and we honor the statesmen of both nations, who, in times of stress and difficulty, so guided the affairs of either country that the truce of God during all those splendid years was never broken.

By the ties of close kinship, and of firm allegiance, by the ties of common institutions and traditions, of a mighty heritage and of vast responsibilities, by the enduring bonds of affection and of duty, we Canadians are bound to the great Empire of which our country forms no inconsiderable part; and we rejoice that those ties were never stronger or closer than they are today. By like ties of kinship, by the bonds of social and commercial intercourse, by the enjoyment of like institutions, by the possession of a common language and literature, by the inheritance of common liberties, by the duties and responsibilities of a citizenship confronted with common problems, by the ties of comradeship and neighborliness, we are also united to you. May the national life of each country be so guided that, while emulating each other in the development and conservation of our natural resources, in

the growth and progress of our industries and our commerce and in every legitimate walk and field of national activity, we may find example from each other of much that is good and little that is evil.

Not only in all that concerns our material civilization, but in the laying of those foundations upon which alone the structure of enduring national greatness can be reared, in the education of the people, in the full appreciation of the duties and responsibilities of citizenship, in the just and equitable organization of our national life, in the cultivation and development of the arts, of science and of literature, in striving to attain the highest ideals and aspirations of nationhood, I pray that we may learn from each other all that is best to be learned.

"Corroborate the bond," said a great British statesman of the last century in speaking of the growing spirit of cordial friendship between the Republic and the Empire. His words find a clear echo in all our hearts. Through a thousand valleys on either side of the boundary line flow the streams from each country to mingle their waters in the mighty river at our feet. So may the ideals and aspirations of the two nations flow in a gracious stream of friendship and peace during all the glorious years of the future.

The President then delivered the President's Address.

(See the Appendix, page 331.)

A recess of fifteen minutes was then taken to enable the members from the various states to nominate members of the General Council.

After the recess, members of the General Council were duly elected.

(See List of General Council, page 155.)

The report of the Executive Committee was presented by the Secretary.

(See Report at End of Minutes, page 105.)

The Secretary:

I will give an epitome of the report. It shows that upon proper local recommendations more than 2000 new members of

the Association have been elected by the Executive Committee. Also that $10,000 has been appropriated to the various committees and Sections of the Association. The details of the appropriations appear in the report of the Treasurer.

An invitation was extended by the committee to the Chief Judge of the court of last resort in each state, the presiding Judge of each Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, the Chief Justice of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia and the Chief Judge of the Court of Commerce to attend this meeting, and to be guests of the Association at its annual banquet. A similar invitation was extended by the Committee on Uniform Procedure to attend its conference in Montreal. Many of those judges are here.

It seems necessary to the Executive Committee to propose a number of amendments to the constitution. They are:

First. An increase in the number of elective members of the Executive Committee from five to seven. The former number was fixed when there were only 1300 members of the Association; now there are 7500 members.

Second. There has been some embarrassment in complying with the rule that a majority of the Local Council in each state must approve a candidate for membership, there being no maximum for members of any Local Council. The Executive Committee recommend an amendment providing for not less than two, nor more than four, members of each Local Council.

Third. The present law provides "an assistant secretary." The Executive Committee recommend that the provision be 66 one or more assistant secretaries."

Fourth. Obituary notices under the present rule have become quite unmanageable, taking up great space. It being difficult to handle the material, the Executive Committee recommend that there be a mere publication of the names, unless there is a special direction to the contrary.

The fifth amendment refers to honorary members. The Executive Committee recommend that power be given to that committee to elect persons of distinction-not members of the Bar of any state in the United States-to honorary membership in the Association.