Agriculture Decisions: Decisions of the Secretary of Agriculture Under the Regulatory Laws Administered in the United States Department of Agriculture, 56. sējums,1. daļaU.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 Up to 1988, the December issue contained a cumulative list of decisions reported for the year, by act, docket numbers arranged in consecutive order, and cumulative subject-index, by act. |
No grāmatas satura
1.–5. rezultāts no 97.
1235. lappuse
... License revocation —- Sanction policy . The Judicial Officer vacated the Order in In re Julian J. Toney , 54 Agric . Dec. 923 ( 1995 ) , and issued an Order permanently revoking Respondents ' license , directing Respondents to cease and ...
... License revocation —- Sanction policy . The Judicial Officer vacated the Order in In re Julian J. Toney , 54 Agric . Dec. 923 ( 1995 ) , and issued an Order permanently revoking Respondents ' license , directing Respondents to cease and ...
1236. lappuse
... license , assessing Respondents a civil penalty of $ 200,000 , and directing Respondents to cease and desist from violating the Animal Welfare Act and the Regulations and Standards . The ALJ found that Respondents in willful violation ...
... license , assessing Respondents a civil penalty of $ 200,000 , and directing Respondents to cease and desist from violating the Animal Welfare Act and the Regulations and Standards . The ALJ found that Respondents in willful violation ...
1238. lappuse
... license is permanently revoked . The revocation provision shall become effective on the 35th day after service of this Order on Respondents . The cease and desist provisions shall become effective on the day after service of this Order ...
... license is permanently revoked . The revocation provision shall become effective on the 35th day after service of this Order on Respondents . The cease and desist provisions shall become effective on the day after service of this Order ...
1239. lappuse
... license revocation provisions of the December 5 , 1995 , Decision and Order in In re Julian J. Toney , supra . However , both Complainant and Respondents recommend the reduction of the $ 200,000 civil penalty assessed against ...
... license revocation provisions of the December 5 , 1995 , Decision and Order in In re Julian J. Toney , supra . However , both Complainant and Respondents recommend the reduction of the $ 200,000 civil penalty assessed against ...
1242. lappuse
... license is permanently revoked . The revocation provision in this Order shall become effective on the 35th day after service of this Order on Respondents . The cease and desist provisions in this Order shall become effective on the day ...
... license is permanently revoked . The revocation provision in this Order shall become effective on the 35th day after service of this Order on Respondents . The cease and desist provisions in this Order shall become effective on the day ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
56 Agric 94 AMA Docket 9th Cir Administrative Law Judge aff'd ALJ's alleged in paragraphs Almond Board Almond Order AMAA Amendment Animal Welfare Act APHIS Blue Diamond Growers Cal-Almond cease and desist civil penalty Complaint County Court Credit-Back crop dealer debarment Decision and Order Default Decision default order proper Dellar DESKINS dismissed equal protection evidence exemption exhibitor filed in 94 handler hereinafter Hodgins Kennel holding the default housing facilities Initial Decision inspection report inspectors issued January 18 JUDGE HUNT Judicial Officer June June 23 KAHN license marketing order Motion Multnomah County November 16 Order 7 C.F.R. Petitioners potatoes primary enclosures proceeding pursuant Rainier cherries record Regulations 9 C.F.R. Regulations and Standards request Respondent failed Respondent's Respondents violated Rules of Practice Secretary September 13 Standards 9 C.F.R. Strebin Farms SWPC Tammi Longhi testified Troutdale Umatilla Counties United violated section Wileman Bros
Populāri fragmenti
1078. lappuse - The reviewing court shall — (1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be — (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
1065. lappuse - ... (1) a statement of the time, place, and nature of public rule making proceedings; (2) reference to the authority under which the rule is proposed; and (3) either the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.
1354. lappuse - Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party and supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
1064. lappuse - General notice of proposed rule making shall be published in the Federal Register (unless all persons subject thereto are named and either personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law...
1145. lappuse - If a timely notice of appeal is filed by a party, any other party may file a notice of appeal...
1597. lappuse - Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 US 748 (1976).
1151. lappuse - When faced with a problem of statutory construction, this Court shows great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration.
1065. lappuse - ... the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.
1065. lappuse - After notice required by this section, the agency shall afford interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of written data, views, or arguments with or without opportunity to present the same orally in any manner; and, after consideration of all relevant matter presented, the agency shall incorporate in any rules adopted a concise general statement of their basis and purpose.
1080. lappuse - Section 706(2) (A) requires a finding that the actual choice made was not 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.' 5 USC § 706(2) (A) (1964 ed., Supp. V). To make this finding the court must consider whether the decision was based on a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment.