Agriculture Decisions: Decisions of the Secretary of Agriculture Under the Regulatory Laws Administered in the United States Department of Agriculture, 56. sējums,1. daļaU.S. Government Printing Office, 1997 Up to 1988, the December issue contained a cumulative list of decisions reported for the year, by act, docket numbers arranged in consecutive order, and cumulative subject-index, by act. |
No grāmatas satura
1.5. rezultāts no 71.
1045. lappuse
... constitute an inverse condemnation of Petitioner Auvil's property contrary to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution ; ( 2 ) that the Secretary of Agriculture did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner by adopting ...
... constitute an inverse condemnation of Petitioner Auvil's property contrary to the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution ; ( 2 ) that the Secretary of Agriculture did not act in an arbitrary and capricious manner by adopting ...
1046. lappuse
... constitute an inverse condemnation of their property ; ( 2 ) constitute an unequal and discriminatory application of the law ; ( 3 ) were adopted in an arbitrary and capricious manner ; ( 4 ) are not based on any objective , scientific ...
... constitute an inverse condemnation of their property ; ( 2 ) constitute an unequal and discriminatory application of the law ; ( 3 ) were adopted in an arbitrary and capricious manner ; ( 4 ) are not based on any objective , scientific ...
1077. lappuse
... constitutes an inverse condemnation of private property under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution . [ Petitioner Auvil ] further alleges that the Department acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it adopted the ...
... constitutes an inverse condemnation of private property under the Fifth Amendment of the United States Constitution . [ Petitioner Auvil ] further alleges that the Department acted arbitrarily and capriciously when it adopted the ...
1092. lappuse
... Constitute an Inverse Condemnation of Private Property Under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ? 2. Did Respondent Agricultural Marketing Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture , Act Arbitrarily and Capriciously in ...
... Constitute an Inverse Condemnation of Private Property Under the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution ? 2. Did Respondent Agricultural Marketing Service , U.S. Department of Agriculture , Act Arbitrarily and Capriciously in ...
1128. lappuse
... constitute a similar hardship . Strebin [ Farms ] was therefore not denied due process or equal protection of the laws . [ The ] petition for modification of the Order [ shall ] be denied . Strebin [ Farms ] violated the Order in 1993 ...
... constitute a similar hardship . Strebin [ Farms ] was therefore not denied due process or equal protection of the laws . [ The ] petition for modification of the Order [ shall ] be denied . Strebin [ Farms ] violated the Order in 1993 ...
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
56 Agric 94 AMA Docket 9th Cir Administrative Law Judge aff'd ALJ's alleged in paragraphs Almond Board Almond Order AMAA Amendment Animal Welfare Act APHIS Blue Diamond Growers Cal-Almond cease and desist civil penalty Complaint County Court Credit-Back crop dealer debarment Decision and Order Default Decision default order proper Dellar DESKINS dismissed equal protection evidence exemption exhibitor filed in 94 handler hereinafter Hodgins Kennel holding the default housing facilities Initial Decision inspection report inspectors issued January 18 JUDGE HUNT Judicial Officer June June 23 KAHN license marketing order Motion Multnomah County November 16 Order 7 C.F.R. Petitioners potatoes primary enclosures proceeding pursuant Rainier cherries record Regulations 9 C.F.R. Regulations and Standards request Respondent failed Respondent's Respondents violated Rules of Practice Secretary September 13 Standards 9 C.F.R. Strebin Farms SWPC Tammi Longhi testified Troutdale Umatilla Counties United violated section Wileman Bros
Populāri fragmenti
1078. lappuse - The reviewing court shall (1) compel agency action unlawfully withheld or unreasonably delayed; and (2) hold unlawful and set aside agency action, findings, and conclusions found to be (A) arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law; (B) contrary to constitutional right, power, privilege, or immunity; (C) in excess of statutory jurisdiction, authority, or limitations, or short of statutory right...
1065. lappuse - ... (1) a statement of the time, place, and nature of public rule making proceedings; (2) reference to the authority under which the rule is proposed; and (3) either the terms or substance of the proposed rule or a description of the subjects and issues involved.
1354. lappuse - Any oral or documentary evidence may be received, but the agency as a matter of policy shall provide for the exclusion of irrelevant, immaterial, or unduly repetitious evidence. A sanction may not be imposed or rule or order issued except on consideration of the whole record or those parts thereof cited by a party and supported by and in accordance with the reliable, probative, and substantial evidence.
1064. lappuse - General notice of proposed rule making shall be published in the Federal Register (unless all persons subject thereto are named and either personally served or otherwise have actual notice thereof in accordance with law...
1145. lappuse - If a timely notice of appeal is filed by a party, any other party may file a notice of appeal...
1597. lappuse - Virginia State Bd. of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc., 425 US 748 (1976).
1151. lappuse - When faced with a problem of statutory construction, this Court shows great deference to the interpretation given the statute by the officers or agency charged with its administration.
1065. lappuse - ... the agency for good cause finds (and incorporates the finding and a brief statement of the reasons therefor in the rules issued) that notice and public procedure thereon are impracticable, unnecessary, or contrary to the public interest.
1065. lappuse - After notice required by this section, the agency shall afford interested persons an opportunity to participate in the rule making through submission of written data, views, or arguments with or without opportunity to present the same orally in any manner; and, after consideration of all relevant matter presented, the agency shall incorporate in any rules adopted a concise general statement of their basis and purpose.
1080. lappuse - Section 706(2) (A) requires a finding that the actual choice made was not 'arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.' 5 USC § 706(2) (A) (1964 ed., Supp. V). To make this finding the court must consider whether the decision was based on a consideration of the relevant factors and whether there has been a clear error of judgment.