...the basis upon which it was traded in the marketplace or a spurious claim for litigation purposes. Where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of obscenity. Certainly in a prosecution which, as here,...

...(which the Court found was one of commercial exploration) in which the publications were presented," and where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of obscenity. Further, the Supreme Court has consistently...

...items, but rather the appeal to prurient interest made in the advertising campaigns. The court remarked, "Where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of 'obscenity.' " To the court, one of the proofs of...

...(which the Court found was one of commercial exploration) in which the publications were presented," and where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of obscenity. Further, the Supreme Court has consistently...

...supported the determination that the material was obscene. In justifying this decision, the Court stated : "Where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of obscenity." The Court thus saw evidence of "pandering"...

...items, but rather the appeal to prurient interest made in the advertising campaigns. The court remarked, "Where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of 'obscenity.' " To the court, one of the proofs of...

...items, but rather the appeal to prurient interest made in the advertising campaigns. The court remarked, "Where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of 'obscenity.' " To the court, one of the proofs of...

...The "leer of the sensualist" was said to permeate the advertisements. Id., at 468. The Court said, "Where the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications, that fact may be decisive in the determination of obscenity." Id., at 470. As Mr. Justice Black said...

...mention of literary values, scientific studies, or moral-political advocacy in Ginzburg's advertising; "[T]he purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications . . ."5° This then is Brennan's first argument: In "close cases" the advertising for publications...

...that, even though the obscenity of the materials themselves might be in doubt, a conviction could stand "[w]here the purveyor's sole emphasis is on the sexually provocative aspects of his publications." The Court found that such "pandering" had been present here. Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383...