 | United States. Supreme Court - 1940 - 894 lapas
...the Court. 308 US in the decision of this Court that both were common carriers subject to the Act. United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co., 226 US 286. Appellant then filed a rate schedule with the Commission specifying its charges for loading and unloading... | |
 | United States. Interstate Commerce Commission - 1941 - 956 lapas
...under the act Prior to the enactment in 1920 of section 15 (5) of the act, the Supreme Court had found in United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co., 226 US 286, that the Union Stock Yard and Transit Company, a public stockyard in Chicago, and the Chicago Junction... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1914 - 914 lapas
...United States v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 US 160 675 United States v. Union Pacific RR Co., 226 US 61 609 United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co., 226 US 286 26 United States v. Wilson, 4 Phil. Rep. 317 99 United States v. Wiltberger, 5 Wheat. 76 60 United... | |
 | Felix Frankfurter - 1915 - 736 lapas
...connecting systems of other carriers, a circumstance to be noticed in determining their true character. United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co., 226 US 286. They are engaged in transportation as that term is defined in the Commerce Act and described in decisions... | |
 | Henry Clifford Spurr, Ellsworth Nichols - 1915 - 1260 lapas
...operation of such through routes, and providing for reasonable compensation to those entitled thereto." See United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. 226 US 286, 57 L. ed. 226, 33 Sup. Ct. Rep. 83, and as to the character of such commerce, Illinois Central R. Co.... | |
 | 1926 - 1180 lapas
...Bluffs Street Ry. v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 230 US 324 (1913) ; partly reversed the Court in United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co., 226 US 286 (1912) ; affirmed the Court in United States v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Ry., 226 US 14 (1912).... | |
 | United States. Supreme Court - 1932 - 720 lapas
...Once a month the railroads paid the Yards Company its charges for unloading. (2) Prior to the decision in United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co., 226 US 286 (December 9, 1912), the unloading charges of the Yards Company had not been contained in any tariff... | |
| |
United States v. Union Stock Yard & Transit Co. 226 US 286, 57 L. 
