Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 31.
71. lappuse
... tort sub - categories described earlier.52 51 III . THE INTRUDING NEWSMAN Intrusion , the first of the four torts in privacy law as described by Dean Prosser , 53 is quite different from the other three . The tort of intrusion occurs ...
... tort sub - categories described earlier.52 51 III . THE INTRUDING NEWSMAN Intrusion , the first of the four torts in privacy law as described by Dean Prosser , 53 is quite different from the other three . The tort of intrusion occurs ...
98. lappuse
... tort . For example , the nonde- famatory falsehood area of privacy law might be merged with the law of libel . The intrusion element of privacy law could be melded into trespass , and the appropriation area could be mixed with the law ...
... tort . For example , the nonde- famatory falsehood area of privacy law might be merged with the law of libel . The intrusion element of privacy law could be melded into trespass , and the appropriation area could be mixed with the law ...
356. lappuse
... tort of appropriation which was first recognized in New York in the case of Roberson v . Rochester Folding Box Co. " When the court denied the exist- ence of appropriation , the New York legislature in reaction passed a statute making ...
... tort of appropriation which was first recognized in New York in the case of Roberson v . Rochester Folding Box Co. " When the court denied the exist- ence of appropriation , the New York legislature in reaction passed a statute making ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation