Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 90.
32. lappuse
... supra note 6 , at 58 . 19. See G. FLANAGAN , supra note 5 , at 63-64 . 20. Finn , Stop Worrying About Your Image , HARPERS , June , 1962 , at 77 . 21. G. FLANAGAN , supra note 5 , at 67-68 22. Hewens & Poppe , supra note 1 , at 10 ...
... supra note 6 , at 58 . 19. See G. FLANAGAN , supra note 5 , at 63-64 . 20. Finn , Stop Worrying About Your Image , HARPERS , June , 1962 , at 77 . 21. G. FLANAGAN , supra note 5 , at 67-68 22. Hewens & Poppe , supra note 1 , at 10 ...
52. lappuse
... supra note 80 , at 465 , 470 ; Developments in the Law - Deceptive Advertising , 80 HARV . L. Rev. 1005 , 1043 ( 1967 ) . Gellhorn in particu- lar criticizes the failure to use market surveys and minimal reliance on expert testimony ...
... supra note 80 , at 465 , 470 ; Developments in the Law - Deceptive Advertising , 80 HARV . L. Rev. 1005 , 1043 ( 1967 ) . Gellhorn in particu- lar criticizes the failure to use market surveys and minimal reliance on expert testimony ...
56. lappuse
... Note , supra note 120 , at 1097 . 147. Note , The FTC Ad Substantiation Program , supra note 140 , at 1428 . 148. Note , Pfizer Reasonable Basis Test - Fast Relief for Consumers but a Headache for Advertisers , supra note 140 , at 596 ; ...
... Note , supra note 120 , at 1097 . 147. Note , The FTC Ad Substantiation Program , supra note 140 , at 1428 . 148. Note , Pfizer Reasonable Basis Test - Fast Relief for Consumers but a Headache for Advertisers , supra note 140 , at 596 ; ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation