Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 69.
94. lappuse
... suggested that in most appro- priation cases , at issue is not a right of privacy , but rather a " right of publicity " that is , the right to control the commercial exploita- tion of oneself.156 Despite the lucid insight of Judge ...
... suggested that in most appro- priation cases , at issue is not a right of privacy , but rather a " right of publicity " that is , the right to control the commercial exploita- tion of oneself.156 Despite the lucid insight of Judge ...
385. lappuse
... suggested that a substantially longer waiting period could be required of a patentee who applies for trade- mark protection , so as to counterbalance the higher costs and risks which competitors of the fully differentiated product would ...
... suggested that a substantially longer waiting period could be required of a patentee who applies for trade- mark protection , so as to counterbalance the higher costs and risks which competitors of the fully differentiated product would ...
397. lappuse
... suggested test of functionality would find the disputed shapes to be functional in virtually every instance , and ... suggests that ineligibility for one form of protection should assure eligibil- ity for the other . siveness to source ...
... suggested test of functionality would find the disputed shapes to be functional in virtually every instance , and ... suggests that ineligibility for one form of protection should assure eligibil- ity for the other . siveness to source ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation