Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 80.
405. lappuse
... Statutes Reviewed The Court reviewed three sets of factual circumstances , and at the same time ruled on the Texas Obscenity Statute and statutes relating to public nuisances . The cases arose from the Plaintiff's actions for ...
... Statutes Reviewed The Court reviewed three sets of factual circumstances , and at the same time ruled on the Texas Obscenity Statute and statutes relating to public nuisances . The cases arose from the Plaintiff's actions for ...
406. lappuse
... statute . In each case , the statute under which the film and projector were seized was the " Criminal Instrument " statute . The statute makes it a separate offense to possess such an instrument . Charges of violating the statute were ...
... statute . In each case , the statute under which the film and projector were seized was the " Criminal Instrument " statute . The statute makes it a separate offense to possess such an instrument . Charges of violating the statute were ...
492. lappuse
... statute that made it unlawful to publicly treat with contempt the flag of the United States.29 The United States district court granted ha- beas corpus because the statute was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.30 The Supreme Court ...
... statute that made it unlawful to publicly treat with contempt the flag of the United States.29 The United States district court granted ha- beas corpus because the statute was unconstitutionally vague and overbroad.30 The Supreme Court ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation