Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 41.
274. lappuse
... Showing Obscene Film Can Be Unconstitutional Defendant was charged with showing motion pictures with- out a license , after the license had been revoked for showing one film judged to be obscene . The Court held that the ordinance was ...
... Showing Obscene Film Can Be Unconstitutional Defendant was charged with showing motion pictures with- out a license , after the license had been revoked for showing one film judged to be obscene . The Court held that the ordinance was ...
395. lappuse
... showing that source confusion is likely , 177 rather than requiring a showing of actual consumer confusion in order to grant relief . Two important aspects of the palming - off doctrine detract from the appeal of this doctrine . First ...
... showing that source confusion is likely , 177 rather than requiring a showing of actual consumer confusion in order to grant relief . Two important aspects of the palming - off doctrine detract from the appeal of this doctrine . First ...
404. lappuse
... showing of special damages in order for the Plaintiff to pre- vail . Bordoni v New York Times Co. , Inc. , 400 F. Supp . 1223 Public Surveyor Is A " Public Official " The Defendant , a newspaper , discussed the flooding problem in a ...
... showing of special damages in order for the Plaintiff to pre- vail . Bordoni v New York Times Co. , Inc. , 400 F. Supp . 1223 Public Surveyor Is A " Public Official " The Defendant , a newspaper , discussed the flooding problem in a ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation