Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 34.
100. lappuse
... promotional allowance under consideration is that given by manufacturers to their customers subject to the perform- ance of specified promotional activities . For a given allowance , such customer activities might include advertising in ...
... promotional allowance under consideration is that given by manufacturers to their customers subject to the perform- ance of specified promotional activities . For a given allowance , such customer activities might include advertising in ...
108. lappuse
the respondent seller to contribute to its anniversary promotion . The buyer's promotion included newspaper ... promotional allowances in excess of promotional costs was a significant issue . Fred Meyer , a grocery chain , solic ...
the respondent seller to contribute to its anniversary promotion . The buyer's promotion included newspaper ... promotional allowances in excess of promotional costs was a significant issue . Fred Meyer , a grocery chain , solic ...
116. lappuse
... promotional payment that more than compensates him for the cost of ren- dering the service . " He first notes that the Commission has approved the payment of graduated allowances for graduated promotions , but then suggests that a flat ...
... promotional payment that more than compensates him for the cost of ren- dering the service . " He first notes that the Commission has approved the payment of graduated allowances for graduated promotions , but then suggests that a flat ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation