Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 35.
23. lappuse
... prohibit the NCEN in making a fair presentation of its side of controversy . Therefore , they stated that the injunction should not prohibit them from stating that there is scientific evi- dence supporting the theory that cholesterol ...
... prohibit the NCEN in making a fair presentation of its side of controversy . Therefore , they stated that the injunction should not prohibit them from stating that there is scientific evi- dence supporting the theory that cholesterol ...
107. lappuse
... prohibit discrimination between customers generally . " Id . See E. W. KINTNER , AN ANTITRUST PRIMER 60-61 ( 2d ed . 1973 ) . 26. The Supreme Court has stated generally that : The Robinson - Patman Act was enacted in 1936 to curb and ...
... prohibit discrimination between customers generally . " Id . See E. W. KINTNER , AN ANTITRUST PRIMER 60-61 ( 2d ed . 1973 ) . 26. The Supreme Court has stated generally that : The Robinson - Patman Act was enacted in 1936 to curb and ...
294. lappuse
... prohibit such practices and also require that the store post , at store entrances and check - out counters , a copy of the ad and a statement requesting customers to check marked prices against the advertised prices . In addition ...
... prohibit such practices and also require that the store post , at store entrances and check - out counters , a copy of the ad and a statement requesting customers to check marked prices against the advertised prices . In addition ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation