Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.3. rezultāts no 48.
304. lappuse
... patents include soft drink bottles or chairs . The sub- ject of plant patents has little to do with either of the foregoing ; plant patent protection is limited to certain novel asexually propagated plant species . " Copyrights may be ...
... patents include soft drink bottles or chairs . The sub- ject of plant patents has little to do with either of the foregoing ; plant patent protection is limited to certain novel asexually propagated plant species . " Copyrights may be ...
309. lappuse
... patents which were unlimited in duration , the types of patents to be discussed here are strictly of limited duration.26 From the date of issue , the duration of patent pro- tection depends upon the kind of patent issued : ( 1 ) utility ...
... patents which were unlimited in duration , the types of patents to be discussed here are strictly of limited duration.26 From the date of issue , the duration of patent pro- tection depends upon the kind of patent issued : ( 1 ) utility ...
310. lappuse
dure for acquiring all patents is similar although the standards of eligibility for a patent may vary in material respect depend- ing upon the type of patent sought . As mentioned above , four kinds of utility patents are defined in the ...
dure for acquiring all patents is similar although the standards of eligibility for a patent may vary in material respect depend- ing upon the type of patent sought . As mentioned above , four kinds of utility patents are defined in the ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation