Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 18.
250. lappuse
... operator has been infringed , and the access provision seems safe from attack on the ground of freedom of speech or press . Another parallel in the FCC's treatment of broadcasters and cable operators is the rules designed to promote ...
... operator has been infringed , and the access provision seems safe from attack on the ground of freedom of speech or press . Another parallel in the FCC's treatment of broadcasters and cable operators is the rules designed to promote ...
251. lappuse
... operator , rules requiring the cable operator to origi- nate programming and to provide facilities for presentation of programs produced locally do not contravene the cable operators ' freedom of press . Regulatory Jurisdiction and ...
... operator , rules requiring the cable operator to origi- nate programming and to provide facilities for presentation of programs produced locally do not contravene the cable operators ' freedom of press . Regulatory Jurisdiction and ...
255. lappuse
... operator discretion to develop the content of cable service . How- ever , because of economic constraints and fragmentation ... operators may be expected to charge what the traffic will bear . In such a free trade market , business has a ...
... operator discretion to develop the content of cable service . How- ever , because of economic constraints and fragmentation ... operators may be expected to charge what the traffic will bear . In such a free trade market , business has a ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation