Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 46.
161. lappuse
... Notice appeared , at least that was the way in which Commissioner H. Rex Lee perceived it.14 However , it is somewhat inaccurate to say that the 1971 Notice merely rearticulated the 1960 policy statement . The 1960 state- ment dealt ...
... Notice appeared , at least that was the way in which Commissioner H. Rex Lee perceived it.14 However , it is somewhat inaccurate to say that the 1971 Notice merely rearticulated the 1960 policy statement . The 1960 state- ment dealt ...
454. lappuse
... notice of copyright shall be placed on all publicly distributed copies . 1973 If the required notice is omitted , copyright will be forfeited unless ( 1 ) " the notice has been omitted from no more than a relatively small number of ...
... notice of copyright shall be placed on all publicly distributed copies . 1973 If the required notice is omitted , copyright will be forfeited unless ( 1 ) " the notice has been omitted from no more than a relatively small number of ...
457. lappuse
... notice . However , if A's distribution of his works were held to be a publication , A could rely upon §405 of the revision bill in order to cure the omission of notice , even if the omission was inten- tional.86 §405 ( a ) ( 3 ) does ...
... notice . However , if A's distribution of his works were held to be a publication , A could rely upon §405 of the revision bill in order to cure the omission of notice , even if the omission was inten- tional.86 §405 ( a ) ( 3 ) does ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation