Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 77.
137. lappuse
... ment whereby the Defendants recognized the validity of the trade- mark CARROM and agreed for the period of three years not to use that word in a more prominent manner than the use on the date of the agreement . Further , they could not ...
... ment whereby the Defendants recognized the validity of the trade- mark CARROM and agreed for the period of three years not to use that word in a more prominent manner than the use on the date of the agreement . Further , they could not ...
264. lappuse
... ment reserved certain rights in the transferor , this rendered the transfer a license rather than an assignment . The Court dis- agreed . Since the permission was subject to the business judg- ment of the transferee , the effect was to ...
... ment reserved certain rights in the transferor , this rendered the transfer a license rather than an assignment . The Court dis- agreed . Since the permission was subject to the business judg- ment of the transferee , the effect was to ...
291. lappuse
... ment " . That is , broadcast media must be treated differently from print media because there is not the same freedom of entry into the business . There are only so many frequencies , so many channels . But , the Chairman stated that ...
... ment " . That is , broadcast media must be treated differently from print media because there is not the same freedom of entry into the business . There are only so many frequencies , so many channels . But , the Chairman stated that ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation