Publishing, Entertainment, Advertising and Allied Fields Law Quarterly, 14. sējumsCallaghan & Company, 1975 |
No grāmatas satura
1.–3. rezultāts no 71.
52. lappuse
... means . Millstein , supra note 80 , at 470. The Commission allowed the admission of market surveys in ITT Continental Baking Co. , 3 Trade Reg . Rep . ¶ 20,464 , at 20,377 ( FTC 1973 ) , but made no effort to conduct its own . 123 ...
... means . Millstein , supra note 80 , at 470. The Commission allowed the admission of market surveys in ITT Continental Baking Co. , 3 Trade Reg . Rep . ¶ 20,464 , at 20,377 ( FTC 1973 ) , but made no effort to conduct its own . 123 ...
98. lappuse
... means of ordering the haphazardly created con- geries of rulings we refer to as the law of privacy . A merger of the law of privacy and libel , however , seems more unlikely as time passes and as each of the four areas of privacy law is ...
... means of ordering the haphazardly created con- geries of rulings we refer to as the law of privacy . A merger of the law of privacy and libel , however , seems more unlikely as time passes and as each of the four areas of privacy law is ...
304. lappuse
... means of express- ing an idea ; a utility patent protects novel means of its imple- mentation . A copyright allows its " proprietor " to prevent the copying ( and , in some instances , the performance ) of that ex- pression . It may be ...
... means of express- ing an idea ; a utility patent protects novel means of its imple- mentation . A copyright allows its " proprietor " to prevent the copying ( and , in some instances , the performance ) of that ex- pression . It may be ...
Saturs
Current Cases | 1 |
Current FTC and other Actions | 17 |
The Regulation of Corporate Image Advertising | 29 |
Autortiesības | |
14 citas sadaļas nav parādītas.
Citi izdevumi - Skatīt visu
Bieži izmantoti vārdi un frāzes
2d Cir action Amendment Appeals applied artist broadcasting buyer cable television cert character charged claims commercial Commission common law Communications Compco complaint consent order constitutional consumer copy Corp corporate image advertising cost Court found Court held D.C. Cir damages Day-Brite Lighting deceptive decision defamation Defendant Defendant's denied design patent effect expression fact fairness doctrine false federal Federal Trade Commission freedom function functionality doctrine gag orders granted imitation infringement injunction involved Justice Lanham Act libel licensees limited ment newspaper obscene opinion performance person Plaintiff political Principal Register prohibit promotional public interest public issues published reasonable registration regulation Robinson-Patman Act rule section 2(d seller speech statements statute statutory style substantial Supp Supplemental Register supra note Supreme Court text accompanying notes tion trade trademark protection unfair competition utility patent violation